2 Pre Game Techs

[Adam]

Originally Posted by fiasco

I thought you meant no one on the board cares what Nevada thinks.

Rut never means what you thought he meant when you thought he was wrong.

[fiasco]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Rut never means what you thought he meant when you thought he was wrong.

Yes, he's "clever" like that.

[BktBallRef]

Originally Posted by snaqwells

rut never means what you thought he meant when you thought he was wrong.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Rut never means what you thought he meant when you thought he was wrong.

Every comment I make does not revolve around this place or the people here.

Peace

[fiasco]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Every comment I make does not revolve around this place or the people here.

That's got to be one of the most ironic things I've read here in a long time.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by fiasco

That's got to be one of the most ironic things I've read here in a long time.

I am still waiting for that name? Just one will do.

Or is this another "yabut" from you?

Peace

[Adam]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

I am still waiting for that name? Just one will do.

Or is this another "yabut" from you?

Peace

Gratuitous and cheap shot, he already explained what he thought you meant; which wasn't exactly unreasonable given the words you used.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Gratuitous and cheap shot, he already explained what he thought you meant; which wasn't exactly unreasonable given the words you used.

First of all it was not a cheap shot unless you know the origin (which only a few people would know about here) of my comments. Also you got involved in a situation you tried to claim what I was trying to say. So if you do not like what I had to say, why did you get your behind in the conversation?

And if it was not unreasonable, then why did you try to suggest I changed what I said to be right? You certainly must not pay attention as I say here all the time to you and others, we do not work for the NF and what they say means nothing if your state, jurisdiction or association has a say or policy. Heck did you not try to make that point when we were talking about coming dressed to games? It would have been easy if you just used more than your fingers on a keyboard.

That is what I thought.

Peace

[fiasco]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

First of all it was not a cheap shot unless you know the origin (which only a few people would know about here) of my comments. Also you got involved in a situation you tried to claim what I was trying to say. So if you do not like what I had to say, why did you get your behind in the conversation?

And if it was not unreasonable, then why did you try to suggest I changed what I said to be right? You certainly must not pay attention as I say here all the time to you and others, we do not work for the NF and what they say means nothing if your state, jurisdiction or association has a say or policy. Heck did you not try to make that point when we were talking about coming dressed to games? It would have been easy if you just used more than your fingers on a keyboard.

That is what I thought.

Peace

I'm entirely convinced you are the only one who understands what in the heck you're talking about.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

First of all it was not a cheap shot unless you know the origin (which only a few people would know about here) of my comments.

Here are the string of comments to which I was responding:

Originally Posted by JRutledge

10-5-4 maybe?

You know the entire team has the same jersey that is illegal jersey and they are about to participate in that game (starters and subs). Oh and we do not work for the NF, the powers that be want a T for this before the game, which is their right to interpret the rules or make the rule more punitive if they choose. So you can save all your interpretations, semantics or even word play, no one cares what you think around here.

Peace

Originally Posted by fiasco

That's not entirely true.

Originally Posted by JRutledge

People in the Illinois office care what Nevada thinks about this issue? Name one?

I will give you a day to come up with a name too.

Peace

Originally Posted by fiasco

I thought you meant no one on the board cares what Nevada thinks.

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Nope.

Peace

That's it, I'm not responding to any thoughts you have about the Illinois powers as they relate to Nevadaref. Your initial comments could have been taken either way, unless you know for sure fiasco was lying. So yes, it was a cheap and gratuitous shot at fiasco.

Sure, no one in Illinois cares about Nevadaref, but plenty in here see his input as valuable. It's obvious to anyone reading that there was a miscommunication.

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Also you got involved in a situation you tried to claim what I was trying to say. So if you do not like what I had to say, why did you get your behind in the conversation?

When did I claim what you were trying to say?

Originally Posted by JRutledge

And if it was not unreasonable, then why did you try to suggest I changed what I said to be right? You certainly must not pay attention as I say here all the time to you and others, we do not work for the NF and what they say means nothing if your state, jurisdiction or association has a say or policy. Heck did you not try to make that point when we were talking about coming dressed to games? It would have been easy if you just used more than your fingers on a keyboard.

I'm not even sure what you're saying here. The words are all English, but I have no idea what they mean.