2 Pre Game Techs

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by fiasco

That's got to be one of the most ironic things I've read here in a long time.

I am still waiting for that name? Just one will do.

Or is this another "yabut" from you?

Peace

[Rob1968]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Why didn't you just put some air into your whistle like our colleagues in the Lone Star State do?

It's a great idea. Had I been sure that they could hear it and recognize what it meant, I would have.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

I am still waiting for that name? Just one will do.

Or is this another "yabut" from you?

Peace

Gratuitous and cheap shot, he already explained what he thought you meant; which wasn't exactly unreasonable given the words you used.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Gratuitous and cheap shot, he already explained what he thought you meant; which wasn't exactly unreasonable given the words you used.

First of all it was not a cheap shot unless you know the origin (which only a few people would know about here) of my comments. Also you got involved in a situation you tried to claim what I was trying to say. So if you do not like what I had to say, why did you get your behind in the conversation?

And if it was not unreasonable, then why did you try to suggest I changed what I said to be right? You certainly must not pay attention as I say here all the time to you and others, we do not work for the NF and what they say means nothing if your state, jurisdiction or association has a say or policy. Heck did you not try to make that point when we were talking about coming dressed to games? It would have been easy if you just used more than your fingers on a keyboard.

That is what I thought.

Peace

[fiasco]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

First of all it was not a cheap shot unless you know the origin (which only a few people would know about here) of my comments. Also you got involved in a situation you tried to claim what I was trying to say. So if you do not like what I had to say, why did you get your behind in the conversation?

And if it was not unreasonable, then why did you try to suggest I changed what I said to be right? You certainly must not pay attention as I say here all the time to you and others, we do not work for the NF and what they say means nothing if your state, jurisdiction or association has a say or policy. Heck did you not try to make that point when we were talking about coming dressed to games? It would have been easy if you just used more than your fingers on a keyboard.

That is what I thought.

Peace

I'm entirely convinced you are the only one who understands what in the heck you're talking about.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by fiasco

I'm entirely convinced you are the only one who understands what in the heck you're talking about.

Scratch that!!!

I think you are a troll and the more I read your stuff the more that is becoming evident to me.

Peace

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by fiasco

I'm entirely convinced you are the only one who understands what in the heck you're talking about.

Think about that a little more.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

First of all it was not a cheap shot unless you know the origin (which only a few people would know about here) of my comments.

Here are the string of comments to which I was responding:

Originally Posted by JRutledge

10-5-4 maybe?

You know the entire team has the same jersey that is illegal jersey and they are about to participate in that game (starters and subs). Oh and we do not work for the NF, the powers that be want a T for this before the game, which is their right to interpret the rules or make the rule more punitive if they choose. So you can save all your interpretations, semantics or even word play, no one cares what you think around here.

Peace

Originally Posted by fiasco

That's not entirely true.

Originally Posted by JRutledge

People in the Illinois office care what Nevada thinks about this issue? Name one?

I will give you a day to come up with a name too.

Peace

Originally Posted by fiasco

I thought you meant no one on the board cares what Nevada thinks.

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Nope.

Peace

That's it, I'm not responding to any thoughts you have about the Illinois powers as they relate to Nevadaref. Your initial comments could have been taken either way, unless you know for sure fiasco was lying. So yes, it was a cheap and gratuitous shot at fiasco.

Sure, no one in Illinois cares about Nevadaref, but plenty in here see his input as valuable. It's obvious to anyone reading that there was a miscommunication.

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Also you got involved in a situation you tried to claim what I was trying to say. So if you do not like what I had to say, why did you get your behind in the conversation?

When did I claim what you were trying to say?

Originally Posted by JRutledge

And if it was not unreasonable, then why did you try to suggest I changed what I said to be right? You certainly must not pay attention as I say here all the time to you and others, we do not work for the NF and what they say means nothing if your state, jurisdiction or association has a say or policy. Heck did you not try to make that point when we were talking about coming dressed to games? It would have been easy if you just used more than your fingers on a keyboard.

I'm not even sure what you're saying here. The words are all English, but I have no idea what they mean.

[just another ref]

I bet anyone a million dollars that this exchange is not over.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

That's it, I'm not responding to any thoughts you have about the Illinois powers as they relate to Nevadaref. Your initial comments could have been taken either way, unless you know for sure fiasco was lying. So yes, it was a cheap and gratuitous shot at fiasco.

They could have been, but they weren't about him. Now what?

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Sure, no one in Illinois cares about Nevadaref, but plenty in here see his input as valuable. It's obvious to anyone reading that there was a miscommunication.

There was a miscommunication with one person who is a troll (and I am not saying that based on my interaction BTW). He and you have not said, "my bad...sorry I misunderstood." Nope, you had to make this about something it was not. Then have the nerve to talk about who gave a cheap shot. Laughable.

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

When did I claim what you were trying to say?



I'm not even sure what you're saying here. The words are all English, but I have no idea what they mean.

The bottom line is I was not talking to you. My comments were not to you, my comment about whether why we called a T was not to you or the rules that applied. Actually none of you involved were apart of my comments that decided to chime in. I was talking to the person that asked a question and I gave him an example of something that happened to me last night. Now why you and others insist on commenting on things that have nothing to do with you, then get offended when I respond is beyond me. Now anything else you want to lecture me on?

Peace

[fiasco]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

The bottom line is I was not talking to you. My comments were not to you, my comment about whether why we called a T was not to you or the rules that applied. Actually none of you involved were apart of my comments that decided to chime in. I was talking to the person that asked a question and I gave him an example of something that happened to me last night. Now why you and others insist on commenting on things that have nothing to do with you, then get offended when I respond is beyond me. Now anything else you want to lecture me on?

It's astounding to me that you have close to 18,000 posts and you still fail to understand basic Internet message board interaction 101.

[APG]

What's the over/under on number of posts that will get deleted in this thread?