Resumption of Play

[Freddy]

Originally Posted by BLS

What say you?

I say Casebook 7.5.1A, which seems to shed light on your questions regarding the ROP.

Note the COMMENT: "Each different time . . ."

Does that cover it?

[BLS]

That's what I've always thought. What had me confused is why both 7-5-1 c and d are included:

7-5-1-c: "following a violation by one team only,if that team continues to delay when authorized to make a throw-in, it is a technical foul."

7-5-1-d: Following a violation by both teams, any further delay by either team is a technical foul.

Under 7-5-1-c, "following a violation by one team only..."
How could team A violate again if team B puts the ball in play?

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by BLS

That's what I've always thought. What had me confused is why both 7-5-1 c and d are included:

7-5-1-c: "following a violation by one team only,if that team continues to delay when authorized to make a throw-in, it is a technical foul."

7-5-1-d: Following a violation by both teams, any further delay by either team is a technical foul.

Under 7-5-1-c, "following a violation by one team only..."
How could team A violate again if team B puts the ball in play?

If they are not ready to play after the timeout or intermission and Team A has been given the opportunity to get the ball.

Peace

[Indianaref]

Freddy has it right:
COMMENT: Each different time a team has delayed returning to the court after a time-out or between quarters, the resumption-of-play procedure should be used. However, if a team refuses to play after technical fouls have been assessed, the game may be forfeited. (4-38; 5-4-1)

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by BLS

Under 7-5-1-c, "following a violation by one team only..."
How could team A violate again if team B puts the ball in play?

They can't violate again during that throw-in for the reason you state, but they might during the next one.