team control foul

[bainsey]

Originally Posted by Scrapper1

We could remove the definitions of "player control foul" and "team control foul" and add a definition for "offensive foul"....

The flaw here, as BayState pointed out, is that too many people think of a rebounding foul (while there's no team control) by the offensive team as an offensive foul. They'd have a valid point, too, as that team on that end of the floor is still considered to be on offense.

Player/team control determine more rules than just fouls. The more fans that knew about player/team control, the better we'd all be. Stick with control.

[APG]

Originally Posted by bainsey

The flaw here, as BayState pointed out, is that too many people think of a rebounding foul (while there's no team control) by the offensive team as an offensive foul. They'd have a valid point, too, as that team on that end of the floor is still considered to be on offense.

Player/team control determine more rules than just fouls. The more fans that knew about player/team control, the better we'd all be. Stick with control.

I think most people actually think of rebounding fouls as loose ball fouls...just like in the NBA, and expect free throws regardless of whom gets fouled.

[Scrapper1]

Originally Posted by bainsey

The flaw here, as BayState pointed out, is that too many people think of a rebounding foul (while there's no team control) by the offensive team as an offensive foul.

I don't mean to come across as merely contradictory, but I just disagree. I think APG's comment below is actually closer to the truth:

Originally Posted by AllPurposeGamer

I think most people actually think of rebounding fouls as loose ball fouls...just like in the NBA, and expect free throws regardless of whom gets fouled.