![]() |
|
|
|||
"The only affect the rule change would have would be during the time after the throw-in pass bounces in the FC (TC and FC status are now in place) and before a player gains control inbounds (at which point the applicable rules are the same as last year). At most, we're talking about 2 seconds or so, so it's not really that big of an effect."
Snaq, I don't think that is correct because it doesn't matter how many seconds elapse when the throw-in pass bounces on the floor and before it is touched by a player since the throw-in still hasn't ended. Obviously, we can't start a 3 count before the TI ends. I think what the caseplay above is saying is, for 3 second purposes, there must be player control (therefore TC) on the floor in the FC before any 3-count begins following a throw-in. Last edited by billyu2; Wed Sep 21, 2011 at 10:51pm. |
|
||||
Quote:
2. When the throw-in ends isn't relevant to the rule. 3. The rule/case play does not say PC must be established in the FC. It says there must be team control and the ball needs to have FC status.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. Last edited by Adam; Thu Sep 22, 2011 at 12:11pm. |
|
|||
See post #10 gents.
I think we will have to officiate based on Intent & Purpose vs. Rules/Case Plays in some situations. NFHS basically said nothing else was meant to be changed since last season, except there is now t/c on a throw-in. For me, once an OOB t/c throw-in legally ends, p/c re-establishes t/c inbounds. If you think about it, we arent chopping in time & the shot clock (where used) will not start until the ball is legally touched so why should we be counting 3 seconds with a stopped clock?
__________________
I gotta new attitude! |
|
||||
I'm not discussing how it should be called. The committee was clear on their intent. I'm addressing the rule as written, along with a couple if misconceptions. Fast forward about fifteen years when the stated intent has faded from memory, if they don't change the rule to match the intent, you're going to see a lot of officials get this wrong when trying to apply the "rules as written."
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. Last edited by Adam; Thu Sep 22, 2011 at 12:09pm. |
|
|||
Here's how you get it right. Remove ALL of the stupid changes to team control. Then add ONE line to the definition of "Team Control Foul". . .
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
I thought we were discussing when the counts for violations begin... if we're talking fouls, everything is t/c during the throw-in & up until a change of possession, try or the ball becoming dead.
__________________
I gotta new attitude! |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A question on a play and a mechanics question. | aevans410 | Baseball | 11 | Mon May 12, 2008 09:23am |
two questions - start of half question and free throw question | hoopguy | Basketball | 6 | Wed Mar 28, 2007 11:12pm |
Rule Question and Mechanics Question | Stair-Climber | Softball | 15 | Fri May 06, 2005 06:44am |
Over the back Question? Sorry mistyped my first question | CoaachJF | Basketball | 15 | Thu Feb 27, 2003 03:18pm |