|
|||
Quote:
Therefore, such a foul would have to be a technical foul. I don't believe so. The basis of the NFHS ruling was that only one technical foul was not enough to compensate the offended team for being deprived of the three-point attempt since they could only score two points from the ensuing free throws, thus two technicals and four FTs were required for fairness. That would not be the case on a two-point attempt. |
|
|||
Quote:
What you are referring to is the provision that makes a team member a legal player once the ball becomes live, if there had been some sort of illegal substitution during a dead ball period. It is two very different situations and 3-3-3 is only applicable to the latter. |
|
|||
Quote:
BTW that very rule and T demonstrates the inability of trying to apply your citation to such situations. If the ball of dead for a throw-in and then play was restarted with one team having six on the court, your citation would make them all legal players. That cannot be the case. |
|
||||
Quote:
Or, an alternative. Following a multiple substitution, the official miscounts and A begins the play with 4 players. A6 jumps in mid-play, catches the pass, and runs over B1. As the official reports the PC foul, the table informs him that A6 did not enter legally. Was A6 ever a legal player?
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
Quote:
Right now, I'm leaning towards any points scored count and penalizing not only the team with a T for more than five participating (or an illegal substitution T to a particular individual, if appropriate for the circumstances) AND penalizing any contact fouls by a non-player as technical fouls to that individual. Until then...shut up. |
|
|||
Ok, I have become convinced that both a team technical foul and an individual technical foul are appropriate if there are six in the game and the sixth man makes a contact foul.
Any points scored or time consumed prior to the official recognizing the problem must count as normal. If A5 departs during live play and A6 enters, then that situation is handled differently. There must be an individual T to the illegally entering substitute and a 2nd one to A6 if he fouls during the ensuing action. Yes, that would DQ him. Harsh, but this isn't hockey. Teams can't sub during live play. |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is NFHS Case Book Play 2.10.1 Sit. G(d) (re: corr. error situation) really an error? | rpirtle | Basketball | 3 | Wed Dec 24, 2008 03:25pm |
NFHS Case Play 10.4.5 Situation E page 84 | Robert E. Harrison | Basketball | 15 | Thu Oct 18, 2007 11:21pm |
Case Play | ejstuart | Soccer | 3 | Thu Apr 22, 2004 12:43am |
NFHS 2002 Case book play 1.5.6 | Mike Simonds | Football | 11 | Mon Mar 03, 2003 12:45pm |