![]() |
|
|||
|
Ron called a "do over"
I was watching it. Garretson administered the play exactly as described.
I think he messed this one up. Section II-Ball a. The ball is out-of-bounds when it touches a player who is out-of-bounds or any other person, the floor, or any object on, above or outside of a boundary or the supports or back of the backboard. or more directly: Section III-Throw In f. A throw-in which touches the floor, or any object on or outside the boundary line, or touches anything above the playing surface is a violation. The ball must be thrown directly inbounds. The only possible exception is: Section II-Ball f. If the ball is interfered with by an opponent seated on the bench or standing on the sideline (Rule 12A-Section IV-a[7]), it shall be awarded to the offended team out-of-bounds nearest the spot of the violation. Unless officials are now defined as opponents, can anyone think of a reason this should not have been Chicago ball? |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| batters interference/interference by teammate | _Bruno_ | Baseball | 7 | Mon Apr 07, 2008 07:28am |
| Bob M. in Referee | waltjp | Football | 4 | Thu Dec 21, 2006 04:36pm |
| New Referee | budjones05 | Football | 10 | Tue Dec 12, 2006 02:16am |
| Runner interference versus umpire interference | Jay R | Baseball | 1 | Thu Apr 28, 2005 07:00pm |
| "Ask The Referee" | A Pennsylvania Coach | Basketball | 24 | Fri Mar 26, 2004 09:21pm |