"Ask The Referee"

[A Pennsylvania Coach]

http://www.lebcohoops.com/referee.htm

...and this, my friends, is how those myths perpetuate themselves...

[Adam]

Someone should email him and ask him what rule prevents the player from saving the ball, establishing position inbounds, and then being the first to touch it.

[Mark Padgett]

Originally posted by Snaqwells
Someone should email him and ask him what rule prevents the player from saving the ball, establishing position inbounds, and then being the first to touch it.

I just did, and I'll post his answer, if I get one.

[zebracz]

Originally posted by A Pennsylvania Coach
http://www.lebcohoops.com/referee.htm

...and this, my friends, is how those myths perpetuate themselves...

" I think he is wrong about when the clock starts, in # 4, as well."

..not sure, though.

[mthomas]

Originally posted by zebracz

" I think he is wrong about when the clock starts, in # 4, as well."

..not sure, though.

1) The clock does not start until the ball is touched by a player on the court.

Page 45 (Rules section), Sec. 9, Art. 4 "If play is resumed by a throw-in, the clock shall be started when the ball touches, or is touched by, a player on the court after it is released by the thrower."


2) The player may touch the ball FIRST after saving the ball and coming back onto the court.

Page 51 (Case book section), 7.1.1. Situation D "A1 jumps from inbounds to retrieve an errant pass near a boundary line. A1 catches teh ball while in the air and tosses it back to the court. A1 lands out of bounds and (a) is the first to touch the ball after returning inbounds, (b) returns inbounds and immediately dribbles the ball; or (c) picks up the ball after returning to the court and then begins a dribble.
Ruling: Legal in (a) and (b). Illegal in (c) as the toss of the ball to the court by A1 constitutes the start of a dribble, dribbling a second time after PICKING up the ball is an illegal dribble violation.

[DJ]

And he can pick up the ball with only one foot down on the court after returning as long as the other foot is not touching out of bounds.

[mplagrow]

But both feet have to be down in bounds for a legal reception in the pros. NCAA only requires that you get one foot in bounds. And throw your hat on the ground when the player runs out of bounds.

I guess what I'm trying to say that "Ask a Referee" should make sure he knows what sport he's talking about!

[BktBallRef]

Originally posted by mplagrow
But both feet have to be down in bounds for a legal reception in the pros. NCAA only requires that you get one foot in bounds. And throw your hat on the ground when the player runs out of bounds.

I guess what I'm trying to say that "Ask a Referee" should make sure he knows what sport he's talking about!

What you suggest applies to a pass in football.

I think "saving the ball" is pretty much a basketball play.

[mplagrow]

That's more or less my point. . .the myth of not being able to be the first one to touch the ball when you come back in bounds came from football!

[Stan]

[/B][/QUOTE]

I just did, and I'll post his answer, if I get one. [/B][/QUOTE]

I'm thinking we shouldn't expect a reply.

[A Pennsylvania Coach]

If you liked that one, you should read the previous "column":

http://216.239.37.104/search?q=cache...hl=en&ie=UTF-8

[rainmaker]

Originally posted by A Pennsylvania Coach
If you liked that one, you should read the previous "column":

http://216.239.37.104/search?q=cache...hl=en&ie=UTF-8

A) Someone should tell Google this isn't worth the bytes it's cached on.

B) I'm glad we've got a good rules interpreter in Oregon. Sheez, what chance do these refs have of ever moving up with this kind of interpretation?!?

[Hawks Coach]

I am now really thinking that a reply is pretty much out of the question. Joe needs to use one (or more) of his lifelines next time he files a column.

[Rich]

Originally posted by Hawks Coach
I am now really thinking that a reply is pretty much out of the question. Joe needs to use one (or more) of his lifelines next time he files a column.

My response to him would go something like this:

"What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened."

[BktBallRef]

Originally posted by A Pennsylvania Coach
If you liked that one, you should read the previous "column":

http://216.239.37.104/search?q=cache...hl=en&ie=UTF-8

Good grief! The answer to #1 is worse than the previous article.

Looks like I'm writing another email!