NFHS is a little ahead of its time

[APG]

Originally Posted by Zoochy

So are the 2 plays, that Snaqwells has listed, violations?

Rule 7, Section 6 Throw-In

Art. 8. Regardless of where the throw-in spot is located, the throw-in team may cause the ball to go into the back court.
Art. 9. After the throw-in ends, an inbounds player in the front court who is not in control of the ball may cause the ball to go into the back court.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Zoochy

So are the 2 plays, that Snaqwells has listed, violations?

Originally Posted by AllPurposeGamer

Rule 7, Section 6 Throw-In

Art. 8. Regardless of where the throw-in spot is located, the throw-in team may cause the ball to go into the back court.
Art. 9. After the throw-in ends, an inbounds player in the front court who is not in control of the ball may cause the ball to go into the back court.

But without the expressed exceptions, they would be.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

But without the expressed exceptions, they would be.

I'm going to assume they will change the throw-in rule to mimic the NCAA. Of course we already know I would like some new case plays to come with it.

[Camron Rust]

The NCAA rule (and presumably the new NFHS rule) effectively only considers there to be team control for the purposes of determining the penalty for fouls that occur during the throw in. Complete "team control" effectively begins in the historic manner....along with player control. No other element normally implied by team control applies until player control is established inbounds.