Cheerleader T Almost Costs Louisville Game....

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by chseagle

After seeing the replay on CBS College Sports, the officiating crew was right in assessing the T.

The clock did happen to stop at 0.3, however without the ball being out into play except by the "Yell King" the clock did restart without Pitt inbounding.

The time should not of ticked off so there was a delay of game due to the game not being yet over.

Hey chseagle, I think I already said that.

Cheerleader T Almost Costs Louisville Game....

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by chseagle

After seeing the replay on CBS College Sports, the officiating crew was right in assessing the T.

The clock did happen to stop at 0.3, however without the ball being out into play except by the "Yell King" the clock did restart without Pitt inbounding.

The time should not of ticked off so there was a delay of game due to the game not being yet over.

But, if the clock started in error, then the officials would have stopped play to re-set the clock. So, the cheerleader's actions did not affect (delay) the game.

[Eastshire]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

But, if the clock started in error, then the officials would have stopped play to re-set the clock. So, the cheerleader's actions did not affect (delay) the game.

But did the cheerleader's mistake induce the timing error? If the officials thought so then the cheerleader did cause the game to be delayed.

[26 Year Gap]

Originally Posted by Eastshire

But did the cheerleader's mistake induce the timing error? If the officials thought so then the cheerleader did cause the game to be delayed.

The timer should have used his taser on the cheerleader. Problem solved.