Postseason Assignments

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by chseagle

What does everyone else's postseason schedule look like?

My schedule looks like a set of squares on a piece of paper. About 4 rows (soemtimes 5), and seven columns per row. Each square has a little number in in -- starting with 1 and going up to 28, 30 or 31. In each square, there's also the name of a school, and a time. Some squares have two entries.

Thanks for asking.

[Adam]

Mine looks a lot like it did durinig the season.

Empty.

[grunewar]

Rec Ball = Good

HS = I'm not there yet

[chseagle]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

My schedule looks like a set of squares on a piece of paper. About 4 rows (soemtimes 5), and seven columns per row. Each square has a little number in in -- starting with 1 and going up to 28, 30 or 31. In each square, there's also the name of a school, and a time. Some squares have two entries.

Thanks for asking.

Can I nominate this post as the post of the day?

[Welpe]

Originally Posted by chseagle

Can I nominate this post as the post of the day?

No.

[grunewar]

Originally Posted by chseagle

Can I nominate this post as the post of the day?

Originally Posted by Welpe

No.

As I recall, at our last Forum Member's Meeting, we re-validated Rule 7, Section 3, Paragraph 2, Subsection 9.a. "Only an actual Official may nominate a post to be "post of the day" on the Offical Forum.

This rule prevents such an action. Good catch!

For you newbies/rookies, this is why book knowledge and a good memory are so important in our avocation!

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by grunewar

As I recall, at our last Forum Member's Meeting

Did you have a quorum of esteemed members?

[Welpe]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Did you have a quorum of esteemed members?

That is not in the IAABO manual.

[chseagle]

Originally Posted by grunewar

As I recall, at our last Forum Member's Meeting, we re-validated Rule 7, Section 3, Paragraph 2, Subsection 9.a. "Only an actual Official may nominate a post to be "post of the day" on the Offical Forum.

This rule prevents such an action. Good catch!

For you newbies/rookies, this is why book knowledge and a good memory are so important in our avocation!

I did not automatically nominate the post however, I asked if it could be nominated, so there is a difference.

[JugglingReferee]

Originally Posted by chseagle

I did not automatically nominate the post however, I asked if it could be nominated, so there is a difference.

Reminds me of a Few Good Men, when Tom Cruise said out loud of his intention to file a motion, and it was denied by the judge. TC then asked the judge to wait until he actually filed the motion before a ruling was made.

[Welpe]

Originally Posted by chseagle

I did not automatically nominate the post however, I asked if it could be nominated, so there is a difference.

Not that it actually matters but I'm a little annoyed Billy pulled the plug on his feeding frenzy of a thread so I'll go ahead and respond to this.

You asked if you could nominate it and I replied that you could not. Grune cited the correct rule, I believe you should have it in a paragraph in the back of your event security and non lethal crowd control procedures manual that you keep in the breast pocket of your winter bdus.

[26 Year Gap]

Originally Posted by grunewar

As I recall, at our last Forum Member's Meeting, we re-validated Rule 7, Section 3, Paragraph 2, Subsection 9.a. "Only an actual Official may nominate a post to be "post of the day" on the Offical Forum.

This rule prevents such an action. Good catch!

For you newbies/rookies, this is why book knowledge and a good memory are so important in our avocation!

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Did you have a quorum of esteemed members?

There was nobody from Louisiana except for Dave. But, his vote counts for a lot.