"Over The Back"

[bainsey]

Originally Posted by RichMSN

Because in the big picture it doesn't matter as much as many officials think it does (or would like it to).

Must be. All I know is, as hard it the mechanics are pushed on the newbies, you'd have to hold the vets to the same standard.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by bainsey

Must be. All I know is, as hard it the mechanics are pushed on the newbies, you'd have to hold the vets to the same standard.

Another thing to think about is the fact that the vets have (typically) learned when it's helpful to deviate from the standard mechanics. It may seem counterintuitive, but the only way to be effective when deviating is to have the proper mechanics down pat.

It's like calling out of your area? Are there times when it's appropriate and helpful? Sure, but the newer officials aren't as likely to understand the difference, and are more likely to see it as a license to ball watch.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by bainsey

All I know is, as hard it the mechanics are pushed on the newbies, you'd have to hold the vets to the same standard.

Almost agree. Except some of the really old grizzled veterans. We've got a forty plus year veteran on our local board who wouldn't know a basketball mechanic from a football mechanic. But we all want to be his partner, because he can officiate the sh** out of a game.

[mbyron]

Had a BV game where it seemed all the home players were 6 inches taller than any of the visiting players. Naturally, white got 80%+ of the rebounds, and red was crying all night for ... guess what ... over the back. I had to bite my tongue several times from telling the coach that tall is not a foul...

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by mbyron

Naturally, white got 80% of the rebounds, and red was crying all night for over the back.

C'mon mbyron. This is the twenty-first century. Get with it. The correct terms are Caucasian, and Native American.