Disagreement with partner last night on rule

[Mark Padgett]

Fed rules. A1 is fouled going to the basket and does not make the shot. He bounces into the wall and gets hurt. Coach is beckoned. A1 seems to recover and coach asks if he can take his two shots before coming out. Partner says OK. I step in and explain the rule. Partner disagrees but I was able to "override" him. No problem with coach who then gets a sub into the game to shoot the free throws. A2 misses the first but makes the second.

Now here's the follow-up. Can A1 come back into the game before the ensuing throw-in?

[Welpe]

No. 3-3-4

[RookieDude]

WELPE'S hit it on the head:

"A player who has been replaced, or directed to leave the game shall not RE-ENTER before the next opportunity to substitiute AFTER THE CLOCK HAS BEEN STARTED properly following his/her replacement."

[Adam]

Unless someone else gets hurt or disqualified, leaving only 5 eligible healthy players total; of course.

[bob jenkins]

Did you tell the coach he could take a TO to keep the player in the game?

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by Welpe

No. 3-3-4

And not even if the coach then chooses to call a timeout....that option "expired" as soon as the sub entered the game for A1.

[BLydic]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Did you tell the coach he could take a TO to keep the player in the game?

ouch

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

And not even if the coach then chooses to call a timeout....that option "expired" as soon as the sub entered the game for A1.

I agree. I meant before the sub came in.

If a coach asks me if an injured player can shoot FTs, my response is along the lines of "only if you ask for a TO."

[Mark Padgett]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Did you tell the coach he could take a TO to keep the player in the game?

Yes. He choose not to do so.

A buddy told me once he asked a coach if he wanted to take a TO to keep an injured player in the game when he knew that team was out of timeouts, but he didn't remind the coach of that when he asked. He said he was somewhat disappointed the coach didn't take one. I think he was kidding about feeling that way, however.

Man, imagine the fallout if that happened and you then went to call the T. Whoa nellie!

[BktBallRef]

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett

Partner disagrees but I was able to "override" him.

The topic read, "Disagreement with partner last night on rule."

Disagreed with what?????

[BillyMac]

Must sit a tick, don’t have to play a tick.

[Mark Padgett]

Originally Posted by BktBallRef

The topic read, "Disagreement with partner last night on rule."

Disagreed with what?????

We disagreed on the rule that the player had to come out of the game because the coach was beckoned. He said the player could shoot the free throws before he had to come out. He said there was an "exception" to the rule for players that were fouled and got to shoot free throws.

[BktBallRef]

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett

We disagreed on the rule that the player had to come out of the game because the coach was beckoned. He said the player could shoot the free throws before he had to come out. He said there was an "exception" to the rule for players that were fouled and got to shoot free throws.

Good grief.

[26 Year Gap]

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett

Yes. He choose not to do so.

A buddy told me once he asked a coach if he wanted to take a TO to keep an injured player in the game when he knew that team was out of timeouts, but he didn't remind the coach of that when he asked. He said he was somewhat disappointed the coach didn't take one. I think he was kidding about feeling that way, however.

Man, imagine the fallout if that happened and you then went to call the T. Whoa nellie!

Might have spared an OT.