What would you do?

[rwest]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Yes ...and I have no idea why they have different and contradictory rulings.

And to be completely honest, I'm not sure that I'd follow that case play anyway if I ever ran into that situation(but don't tell anybody ).

I wont tell anyone. Your secret safe with me. And I wont post it on a public forum either!

[Scratch85]

Is it correct to assume the ensuing throw-in would be on the endline with the ability to run the endline if the last FT was made?

[rwest]

Originally Posted by Scratch85

Is it correct to assume the ensuing throw-in would be on the endline with the ability to run the endline if the last FT was made?

I would think so. Can't see why not.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Scratch85

Is it correct to assume the ensuing throw-in would be on the endline with the ability to run the endline if the last FT was made?

It's not correct to assume that. You should look it up and know it.

(The ruling, however, is correct.)

[tjones1]

Rules rulz!

[amusedofficial]

don't have the book with me... But say it's a close game, A is with ball and up by one, double bonus, 10 sec or less left and B fouls the A's worst shooter, say a .500 foul shooter. He misses the field goal and gets two at the line. Foulee pulls shirt out, is sent off, better shooter (all that remain are better shooters) picked to take the shot, sinks two. Team B, which made strategic foul on a specific player believing they had a good chance he'd hit one or none, so that a field goal would win or tie if they got possession, now must sink a three to tie because A1s violation let A get the lousy shooter off the line. If the lousy shooter went to the line, B would have a good chance at a rebound, and maybe a t/o, after he hits none or one of two.

"So son, you are awful at the line, so if you get fouled in the last half minute, pull your shirt out so we can get someone else to the line"

Or did I miss something?

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by amusedofficial

don't have the book with me... But say it's a close game, A is with ball and up by one, double bonus, 10 sec or less left and B fouls the A's worst shooter, say a .500 foul shooter. He misses the field goal and gets two at the line. Foulee pulls shirt out, is sent off, better shooter (all that remain are better shooters) picked to take the shot, sinks two. Team B, which made strategic foul on a specific player believing they had a good chance he'd hit one or none, so that a field goal would win or tie if they got possession, now must sink a three to tie because A1s violation let A get the lousy shooter off the line. If the lousy shooter went to the line, B would have a good chance at a rebound, and maybe a t/o, after he hits none or one of two.

"So son, you are awful at the line, so if you get fouled in the last half minute, pull your shirt out so we can get someone else to the line"

Or did I miss something?

Yup, you don't send the FT shooter off until after he finishes his FT's.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by tjones1

Rules rulz!

Most of the time.....

That's what makes officiating an art instead of a science.