Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
I follow case book play 3.3.5SitA.
But that's just me. 
Btw, that case play ain't new. They just added a "COMMENT" to it to cover coaches trying to call A TO to keep the player in the game. |
Doesn't that ruling contradict the illegal jewelry / headband ruling?
In both cases, the transgression can be quickly corrected with no delay. SO, why is one player directed to leave, and the other can remain?