Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
Doesn't that ruling contradict the illegal jewelry / headband ruling?
In both cases, the transgression can be quickly corrected with no delay. SO, why is one player directed to leave, and the other can remain?
|
It seems to me that the ruling should have been to remove the player immediately and get a sub for the shooter. Instead they want us to clear the lane and shoot the free throws and then give the ball to team b regardless of whether or not the 2nd free throw is made.
I understand giving the ball to team B since we clear the lane. But what I disagree with is clearing the lane in the first place. It seems a stiff penalty for a uniform violation. Team A loses the chance to get a rebound on the 2nd free throw.
It just doesn't seem to fit with the rule, but I'll enforce it as written, just seems odd to me.