![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
Because, in the end, that's why it's been a consistent Point of Emphasis over the years, because the rules committee feels it does affect the play and it has not been called enough?
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department. (Used with permission.) |
|
|||
|
Quote:
The defense may get a foul but a foul is often better than giving up a layup.The hand check the committee is talking about in the POE is NOT the one where the dribbler has an open shot in front of them and a hand check would kill the drive. It is the one where it bumps/steers a player off of the line to an easy shot...which has often gone uncalled...or where the player has started the shooting motion and the hand check is pushing the shooter away from the basket. I don't believe POE wants us to call a foul that benefits the fouling team.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
|
Quote:
If the defender is already beaten, then you're definitely going to let it go. But if the defender just leaves a hand on the ballhandler continuously as the offense tries to run a play, the POE seems to say that it should be a foul, even if the ballhandler might eventually go to the basket. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Icy roads, 3.5 drive, $53. We do this for the money. | Rich | Basketball | 3 | Sun Feb 10, 2008 02:46pm |
| Five second count on a drive | Back In The Saddle | Basketball | 31 | Wed Nov 22, 2006 12:20pm |
| LBR when F1 catches line drive? | IamMatt | Softball | 11 | Mon Jun 12, 2006 01:53pm |
| Basket Interference question. | Jerry Blum | Basketball | 1 | Tue Nov 16, 2004 09:36am |
| membership drive | johnfox | General / Off-Topic | 0 | Sun Dec 17, 2000 10:21pm |