Stupidity = Worst Win ever

[Mark Padgett]

I see you're in our neighbor to the north. What rule set were you using?

[bainsey]

What you call "unsportsmanlike," Panther, is what we call "intentional" on this side of the St. Croix. Other than that, the penalties all line up exactly.

Nice job. Some story, though! In which town was this?

[Nevadaref]

I would have deemed both the foul by B2 as well as the retaliation by A2 flagrant and disqualified them from the game for their actions.

Putting someone into the bleachers is more than an intentional foul.

Other than that I think that your were fine.

PS I would certainly give some thought to having the first T to the HC be flagrant. People can discuss that.

[Pantherdreams]

Rule Set: FIBA

Location: Amherst, NS

Probably could have justified both A2 and B2 ejections. Although anyone going out of bounds on the side of the court ends up in the bleachers because of court layout. Partner didn't call eject him so I didn't question, A2's tech was his 5th foul disqaulifying him anyway so an ejection is moot.

(We have a proviso stating players under the age of 18 when ejected must remain on the bench unless a coach is available to supervise them in the locker room. So ejection or 5th foul he's staying on the bench anyway.)

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Pantherdreams

Rule Set: FIBA

Location: Amherst, NS

Probably could have justified both A2 and B2 ejections. Although anyone going out of bounds on the side of the court ends up in the bleachers because of court layout. Partner didn't call eject him so I didn't question, A2's tech was his 5th foul disqaulifying him anyway so an ejection is moot.

(We have a proviso stating players under the age of 18 when ejected must remain on the bench unless a coach is available to supervise them in the locker room. So ejection or 5th foul he's staying on the bench anyway.)

Oh, I don't know. I can't comment on whether he deserved ejection or not, but I wouldn't say it's moot. Often times, leagues have penalties extending into future games for ejections, but not for "fouling out." Your player merely fouled out. Here in CO, for example, during the regular high school season, an ejection means a one game suspension.

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

I would have deemed both the foul by B2 as well as the retaliation by A2 flagrant and disqualified them from the game for their actions.

Putting someone into the bleachers is more than an intentional foul.

Other than that I think that your were fine.

PS I would certainly give some thought to having the first T to the HC be flagrant. People can discuss that.

Disagree. Often it's more than intentional, and perhaps in this case, but if the pushee is off balance and a good bump puts him in the first row, that's a garden variety foul, IMO.

Agree. IMO there's no doubt on this one: coach berating opposing player? C'mon.