Murphy's Law in Mass

[Jurassic Referee]

If the story is correct, it sounds like the officials mistakenly assessed a team "T" for touching the ball in the thrower's hands instead of correctly charging the "T" to the player.

But....sometimes these stories aren't factual.

[TimTaylor]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

If the story is correct, it sounds like the officials mistakenly assessed a team "T" for touching the ball in the thrower's hands instead of correctly charging the "T" to the player.

But....sometimes these stories aren't factual.

What JR said.......

It's possible that the T was for breaking the plane after a previous team warning for delay, in which case it is a team technical and not charged to the individual.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by TimTaylor

It's possible that the T was for breaking the plane after a previous team warning for delay, in which case it is a team technical and not charged to the individual.

What TimTaylor said......

You never really know with newspaper accounts.

[just another ref]

Why would the officials call so many fouls? Don't they understand about "offensive flow?"

[Camron Rust]

...or he contacted the thrower for an intentional foul instead of a technical foul and the writer didn't know the difference.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

...or he contacted the thrower for an intentional foul instead of a technical foul and the writer didn't know the difference.

Since it was only the 1st quarter this seems very plausible.

[Amesman]

Seems kinda odd that only the assistant coach is quoted. Thought I was eventually going to read the head coach was tossed.