They were confused...

[chseagle]

2.11.3 SITUATION: When may the scorer signal?

RULING: If the scorer desires to call attention to a player who is illegally in the game, he/she may signal the official when the ball is in control of that player’s team. If it is for a substitution, the scorer may signal when the ball next becomes dead and the clock is stopped. If it is for conferring with an official, he/she may signal when the ball is dead. If the
scorer signals while the ball is live, the official should ignore the signal if a
scoring play is in progress. Otherwise, the official may stop play to determine the reason for the scorer’s signal.

[Adam]

Why are you questioning whether this case is right?

[chseagle]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Why are you questioning whether this case is right?

There was no specific case book play, it was just a question.

[fullor30]

Originally Posted by chseagle

There was no specific case book play, it was just a question.

No, you asked if case book is right.

This is going to sound harsh but you're really very annoying with your posts that for the most part, everyone has to clean up.

I guess you add some value with all your mistakes, they compel us to correct them.

[chseagle]

Originally Posted by fullor30

No, you asked if case book is right.

This is going to sound harsh but you're really very annoying with your posts that for the most part, everyone has to clean up.

I guess you add some value with all your mistakes, they compel us to correct them.

LMAO A work in progress

[26 Year Gap]

Originally Posted by chseagle

LMAO A work in progress

Or perhaps a 'piece of work'.

[fullor30]

Originally Posted by 26 Year Gap

Or perhaps a 'piece of work'.

I imagine that most new posters lurk here for awhile, then stick a big toe in to see how the water is.

This non official just does a clumsy cannon ball in the kiddie pool for an opening act.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by chseagle

There was no specific case book play, it was just a question.

Seriously? You posted a "specific case play," titled your post "case book right?" and didn't put any other questions in your post.

Do you have an actual question, or just the one I wondered about which you somehow denied?

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Seriously? You posted a "specific case play," titled your post "case book right?" and didn't put any other questions in your post.

Do you have an actual question, or just the one I wondered about which you somehow denied?

Probably a matter of punctuation, but I took his meaning to be wonderment about where the information which tells the officials how to handle the situation was obtained. The title of his post should have looked like this: "case book, right?"

[fullor30]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Probably a matter of punctuation, but I took his meaning to be wonderment about where the information which tells the officials how to handle the situation was obtained. The title of his post should have looked like this: "case book, right?"

I actually may agree with you...........

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by fullor30

I actually may agree with you...........

Glad that we got that one in before the end of the decade.