interrrupted dribble

[Upward ref]

if i can get your jokers serious for just a minute ; 4.15.6 ; "during an interrupted dribble : d.)out of bounds violation does not apply on the player involved in the interrupted dribble. " i'm reading : A1 is dribbling when a.) he fumbles the ball and it goes out of bounds b.) it hits his foot and rolls out c.) hits/ touches a teammate and goes out of bounds . in a and b ,interrupted dribble , and no player control (4.15 .art 5 ) .I would normally think out of bounds on A1 , B's ball at p o i . but sec.d says no violation,sounds like it makes this an A.P. decision? in c.) out of bounds off A2 , B's ball at po i . ? what am i missing / misunderstanding ?

[IchiRef]

Originally Posted by Upward ref

d.)out of bounds violation does not apply on the player involved in the interrupted dribble.

It is not an out of bounds violation if, during an interrupted dribble, the player steps out of bounds.

[SamIAm]

Originally Posted by Upward ref

if i can get your jokers serious for just a minute ; 4.15.6 ; "during an interrupted dribble : d.)out of bounds violation does not apply on the player involved in the interrupted dribble. " i'm reading : A1 is dribbling when a.) he fumbles the ball and it goes out of bounds b.) it hits his foot and rolls out c.) hits/ touches a teammate and goes out of bounds . in a and b ,interrupted dribble , and no player control (4.15 .art 5 ) .I would normally think out of bounds on A1 , B's ball at p o i . but sec.d says no violation,sounds like it makes this an A.P. decision? in c.) out of bounds off A2 , B's ball at po i . ? what am i missing / misunderstanding ?

I like to let the experts take the more involved questions, but I am familiar with this one. It means if A1, during an interupted dribble, steps OOB, it is not an OOB violation.

If the ball itself goes OOB, it is an OOB violation on whomever the ball last touched.

[Raymond]

Violation in this case = actually stepping OOB

During an interrupted dribble if the player steps OOB while not in contact with the ball it is not a violation.

If during a normal dribble the players steps OOB it is a violation,whether or not he is in contact with the ball.

[APG]

Look at Rule 9-3-1 Note

The dribbler has committed a violation if he/she steps on or outside a boundary, even though he/she is not touching the ball while he/she is out of bounds.

I think they are trying to make the distinction between when the ball is out of bounds when a player is dribbling the ball and during an interrupted dribble.

Also, know that POI is not the correct term to use. The ball is awarded to the team who did not cause the ball to be out of bounds at the spot nearest the violation. POI is a method of resuming play used in particular situations.

[Upward ref]

ok, thanks. <><

[Mark Padgett]

Originally Posted by Upward ref

what am i missing

Apparently, the CAPS LOCK key on your keyboard.

[Upward ref]

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett

Apparently, the CAPS LOCK key on your keyboard.

That's the way they told me to do it on the "other forum " (grammar and punctuation . ref . com )

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett

Apparently, the CAPS LOCK key on your keyboard.

Odd? When my daughter emails me, her shift key doesn't work.