Intentional

[jallen]

not in FIBA, it would be unsportsman like as there is no intentional foul in FIBA
I know, semantics, in the end the same thing happens

[biggravy]

So because of the T does defender get a free shot at the shooter? If I call the T and still see the whole play (which I thought was flagrant) I am interested in dumping that player anyway. That is flagrant contact live ball or dead ball.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by biggravy

So because of the T does defender get a free shot at the shooter? If I call the T and still see the whole play (which I thought was flagrant) I am interested in dumping that player anyway. That is flagrant contact live ball or dead ball.

I don't think anyone has claimed we should ignore that contact.

[biggravy]

Originally Posted by biggravy

So because of the T does defender get a free shot at the shooter? If I call the T and still see the whole play (which I thought was flagrant) I am interested in dumping that player anyway. That is flagrant contact live ball or dead ball.

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

I don't think anyone has claimed we should ignore that contact.

I'm not saying that anyone is saying that we ignore the contact. I just wanted a dialogue on can we get both in this sitch?

[Adam]

Originally Posted by biggravy

I'm not saying that anyone is saying that we ignore the contact. I just wanted a dialogue on can we get both in this sitch?

Absolutely get both. If, however, it had been a "regular" shooting foul, you may have to ignore it. In this case, if this was the 2nd half (and the coach's team has the ball on this play), the T caused the ball to become dead, so the foul has to be either intentional, flagrant, or ignored.