The world of NCAA recruiting

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

In practice, the UTEP players wouldn't pay the penalty because the UTEP AD wouldn't have hired Floyd, and Kentucky wouldn't have hired whatshisass.

You seem to suggest a coach be punished when they may not have had anything to do with an infraction...but are connected by association. Are you saying that guessing that they were involved is adequate? Or that they were an acquaintance of someone who was?

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

There is a certain level of institutional control that should fall on the coach. If you'd like, we could limit the coach sanctions to situations where the coach was directly involved.

Exactly...only if they were directly involved as shown by actual evidence....not guessing that the must have had something to do with becasue they knew someone who was.

Are you an official who guesses that a foul must have been committed or charges it to all players within 5 feet or do you actually have to see it?