Bulls vs Celtics

DonInKansas · #1 (**permalink**) Tue Apr 28, 2009, 09:18pm

Play at the buzzer to win, he would have had to balled a fist and knocked Miller out to get a flagrant.

BktBallRef · #2 (**permalink**) Wed Apr 29, 2009, 02:18pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by DonInKansas

Play at the buzzer to win, he would have had to balled a fist and knocked Miller out to get a flagrant.

Why? On a play at the buzzer, whether it's flagrant or not wouldn't matter because the ball isn't going to be awarded for a throw-in after the FTs.

Quote:

Originally Posted by btaylor64

The foul was not unnecessary contact therefore no Flagrant.

I think that's very debatable.

refguy · #3 (**permalink**) Wed Apr 29, 2009, 02:56pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BktBallRef

Why? On a play at the buzzer, whether it's flagrant or not wouldn't matter because the ball isn't going to be awarded for a throw-in after the FTs.

I think that's very debatable.

Wrong. There was 2.0 seconds remaining after the foul and on a flagrant, Chicago would have gotten the throw-in with a chance to win the game regardless of the results of Miller's free throws.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Blazers/Celtics 6 on Floor	bc7	Basketball	24	Sat Jan 03, 2009 04:45pm
Lakers/Celtics	jimpiano	Basketball	28	Sun Jun 22, 2008 07:03pm
Bulls-Pistons	BoomerSooner	Basketball	15	Sat May 12, 2007 12:26pm
Rockets & Celtics	Splute	Basketball	15	Tue Feb 27, 2007 03:45pm
Runing with the Bulls !	James Neil	Football	9	Mon Mar 01, 2004 03:56pm