The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 22, 2009, 09:15am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 656
From my area....23 team conference (3 divisions).

Column: Tri-Valley Conference will go to two officials next season - MLive.com
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 23, 2009, 02:52am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Midlothian, VA
Posts: 677
Poopie!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by CoachP View Post
Horse manure reasoning is being used by that conference. I worked one GV game this past season. It was due to a late season addition to the home team's schedule. The calls that I remember the HC from the visiting team complained about would have come from the C had we had one that night. So, I have a hard time believing that a 2 person game in general is the same for all involved that a 3 person game would be.
__________________
THE FLY IS OPEN, LET'S GO PEAY
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 23, 2009, 03:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,029
I still say that the problem lies here:
"Each official working a TVC game in a three-man crew receives $60. With boys and girls varsity games on the same night, the home school pays six officials $360. Officials working in a two-man crew receive $65, but because just four officials would work the two games, it would cost schools only $260."

What group of officials would accept only $5 more to work the game 2-man?

These associations need to take a serious look at their fee structure: Saginaw Officials Association, the Midland Officials Association, the Heart of Michigan Officials Association and the Bay Metro Officials Association.

2-man is FAR more difficult and deserves a greater compensation difference than that. In fact, if the fee was $80 per official in the 2-man system, then the schools probably wouldn't be looking at this as a money saving option. The difference would be negligible. IMO these groups are suffering for their mistake of setting or allowing their 2-man fee to be set too low.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 23, 2009, 10:09am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: TN
Posts: 361
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
I still say that the problem lies here:

What group of officials would accept only $5 more to work the game 2-man?

These associations need to take a serious look at their fee structure: Saginaw Officials Association, the Midland Officials Association, the Heart of Michigan Officials Association and the Bay Metro Officials Association.

IMO these groups are suffering for their mistake of setting or allowing their 2-man fee to be set too low.
FWIW in our state, the officials associations do not set the fee, it is set by the State. The committee that votes to set the fees, 3 years at a time, is populated by ADs and Principles. there are no officials that have a vote.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 23, 2009, 12:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Wasilla Ak
Posts: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ref2coach View Post
FWIW in our state, the officials associations do not set the fee, it is set by the State. The committee that votes to set the fees, 3 years at a time, is populated by ADs and Principles. there are no officials that have a vote.
Sounds like you are under control of the dark side. Use the force ref2. Most people don't appreciate what an official actually goes through unless they have call a game themselves. Get all thoes board members on the court and see how they feel after running a high level 2 crew game.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 23, 2009, 04:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by ref2coach View Post
FWIW in our state, the officials associations do not set the fee, it is set by the State. The committee that votes to set the fees, 3 years at a time, is populated by ADs and Principles. there are no officials that have a vote.
Then the officials in your state need to get together and take a stand if they don't like the make-up of that committee or the fees that it sets.

I do like the idea of telling the committee members to get out there and work the games themselves!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 24, 2009, 12:43am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: TN
Posts: 361
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
Then the officials in your state need to get together and take a stand if they don't like the make-up of that committee or the fees that it sets.

I do like the idea of telling the committee members to get out there and work the games themselves!
No one has a vote except the Schools.

You say the officials need to get together and take a stand. Have you ever met a more independent, hard to lead, group of people than sports officials?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 24, 2009, 11:04am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by ref2coach View Post
No one has a vote except the Schools.

You say the officials need to get together and take a stand. Have you ever met a more independent, hard to lead, group of people than sports officials?
I know officials that would take a pay cut just to improve their schedules.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 23, 2009, 08:47pm
We don't rent pigs
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,627
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post

2-man is FAR more difficult and deserves a greater compensation difference than that.

According to this logic, when 3 man crews first appeared at the high school level, the officials who had previously been working 2 man should have then taken a per-game pay cut. I'm guessing this did not happen.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum.
It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow.


Lonesome Dove
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 24, 2009, 05:35pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref View Post
According to this logic, when 3 man crews first appeared at the high school level, the officials who had previously been working 2 man should have then taken a per-game pay cut. I'm guessing this did not happen.
Your guess would be incorrect concerning my state.
NV added 3-man in top classification (largest schools) in 1997. The officials did so by dividing the previous 2-man fee three ways. Clearly not great then, but look where we are now.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 24, 2009, 05:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 719
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
Your guess would be incorrect concerning my state.
NV added 3-man in top classification (largest schools) in 1997. The officials did so by dividing the previous 2-man fee three ways. Clearly not great then, but look where we are now.
Still not great in Nevada is where you are.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2 man crew refbater Basketball 17 Mon Jan 26, 2009 03:18pm
The crew did nothing... NewNCref Basketball 127 Tue Feb 27, 2007 04:10pm
3 man crew fonzzy07 Basketball 11 Sat Dec 24, 2005 11:50pm
7 man crew bateyes Football 5 Thu Dec 02, 2004 07:38am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:27pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1