Game venting.

[jearef]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

Good question, but that does change the fact that the coaches box privileges are gone once the head coach receives his first T. Whoever replaces the HC does not get the privilege of the coaches box.

I have always thought that once the box is lost, it is lost for everyone. That being said, OHBBREF raises a valid point. I think this one is worthy of its own thread.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by jearef

I have always thought that once the box is lost, it is lost for everyone. That being said, OHBBREF raises a valid point. I think this one is worthy of its own thread.

Let me just pose this question.

Do you really think the rules committee wants the team to gain an advantage (renewed use of the coaching box) from their coach earning a 2nd direct T?

[deecee]

Another scenario thats an eyebrow raiser. The assistant coach is still just that. The head coach has been tossed. The assistant is granted privledges that the HC had and didnt have prior to the tossing. One of those lost privledges the right to the box. He doesn't have that.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by deecee

Another scenario thats an eyebrow raiser. The assistant coach is still just that. The head coach has been tossed. The assistant is granted privledges that the HC had and didnt have prior to the tossing. One of those lost privledges the right to the box. He doesn't have that.

The way I look at it, he's filling in. He gets the same abilities the HC had when he left. He can do what the HC was able to do (request TO, stand to cheer a play, etc.), and cannot do what the HC had lost the ability to do (stand in the box).

[deecee]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

The way I look at it, he's filling in. He gets the same abilities the HC had when he left. He can do what the HC was able to do (request TO, stand to cheer a play, etc.), and cannot do what the HC had lost the ability to do (stand in the box).

I am in agreeance with you. I just re-read what I typed and I think I confused myself...

[Adam]

Originally Posted by deecee

I am in agreeance with you. I just re-read what I typed and I think I confused myself...

I knew you agreed with me on this one, I was just elaborating further.

[Scratch85]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

The way I look at it, he's filling in. He gets the same abilities the HC had when he left. He can do what the HC was able to do (request TO, stand to cheer a play, etc.), and cannot do what the HC had lost the ability to do (stand in the box).

That looks like my post. At least give me a footnote or something.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Scratch85

That looks like my post. At least give me a footnote or something.

I don't know how.

[M&M Guy]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

I don't know how.

I agree with Scratch85.