Weird inbounds play

[JugglingReferee]

Originally Posted by mutantducky

If A has the arrow at the start of the third and the ball is inbounded off A1's leg without any possession does the arrow go to B. I assumed it does, just wanted to check. oh and not a kicked ball or anything.

Assuming A1 is an inbounds player, yes switch the arrow because the throw-in ended when the ball hit A1. Because it then went OB, B gets the ball and the arrow.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by JugglingReferee

Assuming A1 is an inbounds player, yes switch the arrow because the throw-in ended when the ball hit A1. Because it then went OB, B gets the ball and the arrow.

Unnecessary assumption. Check 4-42-5b.

[AKOFL]

Originally Posted by JugglingReferee

Assuming A1 is an inbounds player, yes switch the arrow because the throw-in ended when the ball hit A1. Because it then went OB, B gets the ball and the arrow.

The ball must be legally touched for the throw-in to end, and a kick is not legal. 4-42-5-a

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by mutantducky

if a has the arrow at the start of the third and the ball is inbounded off a1's leg without any possession does the arrow go to b. I assumed it does, just wanted to check. Oh and not a kicked ball or anything.

Originally Posted by akofl

the ball must be legally touched for the throw-in to end, and a kick is not legal. 4-42-5-a