![]() |
|
|
|||
It's not a battle. Its a civil discussion. And I could be wrong. Which case plays? I'll be more than happy to read them.
|
|
|||
Quote:
![]() Say A1 shoots & before it's successful we have a double foul, no t/c but we wont go to the arrow, Team A scored so Team B is entitled to such. |
|
|||
Quote:
However one could also say that once the new throw in begins ball is live and the entitlement is over. Guys, I'm arguing just as much with myself on this one. ![]() Last edited by eyezen; Tue Jan 06, 2009 at 05:07pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
I'm trying to learn here. "Play shall be resumed by one of the following methods. b) A free throw or throw in when the interruption occurred during this activity or if a team is entitled to such." The first part of B tells me how (In OP the throw in was interupted during a throw in, so we restart with a throw in, nothing more nothing less) The second part tells who if there is entitlement. I am making the case that A's entitlement is over once the ball becomes live. Last edited by eyezen; Tue Jan 06, 2009 at 05:22pm. |
|
|||
A's entitlement doesn't end until the throw-in ends (legally or by A's violation). They're entitled to a throw-in, not merely to a live ball.
__________________
Cheers, mb |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|