3-man Switching Mechanics

[eyezen]

I haven't seen this being discused on the forum but I've noticed that IAABO has reverted back to "opposite table" while NFHS has remained "tableside".

For those working in IAABO boards, may be an issue to resolve during preseason meetings.

[mick]

Originally Posted by eyezen

I haven't seen this being discused on the forum but I've noticed that IAABO has reverted back to "opposite table" while NFHS has remained "tableside".

For those working in IAABO boards, may be an issue to resolve during preseason meetings.

If NFHS mechanics immediately followed CCA procedures, rather than delay the adaptations for the future, there would be no need for Fed mechanics committee.

[IREFU2]

Originally Posted by eyezen

I haven't seen this being discused on the forum but I've noticed that IAABO has reverted back to "opposite table" while NFHS has remained "tableside".

For those working in IAABO boards, may be an issue to resolve during preseason meetings.

I hope Fed's dont change it back......

[jritchie]

The only reason I would llike it seen changed back, is due to doing one on one night and have to go and do something else the next. It needs to be the same to avoid confusion, going back and forth from NFHS and CCA

[Back In The Saddle]

But which CCA mechanics should NFHS "adopt", men's or women's? Women are still table side, men are opposite. At least NFHS mechanics and rules are the same between the genders.

[IREFU2]

IMHO, I would think that the Fed's will stay in conjuction with the NCAA-W mechanics due to the fact that Mary Struckhoff is the assistant director of the National Federation of State High School Associations and NCAA coordinator of women's basketball officials.

[jritchie]

Originally Posted by Back In The Saddle

But which CCA mechanics should NFHS "adopt", men's or women's? Women are still table side, men are opposite. At least NFHS mechanics and rules are the same between the genders.

that is exactly what I'm talking about, they should all be the same! One book for all. But that would cut into someone's pocket so won't happen!

[IREFU2]

Originally Posted by jritchie

that is exactly what I'm talking about, they should all be the same! One book for all. But that would cut into someone's pocket so won't happen!

Actually, NFHS rules are closer more too the women, then the mens.

[Back In The Saddle]

Perhaps. But I would think it has more to do with there being too many governing bodies, and each wanting to have their own say. Because, as we all know, we all think we know the best way to do this.

Maybe I should write my own mechanics manual. I'm sure it would be better than any of the others.

[IREFU2]

Originally Posted by back in the saddle

perhaps. But i would think it has more to do with there being too many governing bodies, and each wanting to have their own say. Because, as we all know, we all think we know the best way to do this.

maybe i should write my own mechanics manual. I'm sure it would be better than any of the others. :d

lmao!!!!!!

[OHBBREF]

Originally Posted by mick

If NFHS mechanics immediately followed CCA procedures, rather than delay the adaptations for the future, there would be no need for Fed mechanics committee.

CCA men's or CCA women's?

[mick]

Originally Posted by OHBBREF

CCA men's or CCA women's?

I don't care.

[Back In The Saddle]

Do the CCA even publish 2 person mechanics any more? There's still an awful lot of 2 person out there in Fedlandia.

[tomegun]

I hope people aren't talking about IAABO when talking about governing bodies. IAABO is a middle man that costs the officials more money. There is nothing IAABO boards do that a good association doesn't do. I've been to states with and without IAABO so while this is my opinion I know it is also true.

[Scrapper1]

Originally Posted by mick

I don't care.

I care a little. I really don't like the women's area of responsibility for the Lead in the frontcourt.