Double dribble?

[Back In The Saddle]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

Or travelling?

How so? She was not holding the ball, which is fundamental to traveling.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Back In The Saddle

How so? She was not holding the ball, which is fundamental to traveling.

My bad, I was thinking about a player leaving his/her feet then passing the ball and retrieving it.

[SamIAm]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

My bad, I was thinking about a player leaving his/her feet then passing the ball and retrieving it.

Please forgive me for splitting hairs here, but that is still not a travel.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

My bad, I was thinking about a player leaving his/her feet then passing the ball and retrieving it.

Originally Posted by SamIAm

Please forgive me for splitting hairs here, but that is still not a travel.

Yes it is...That would be a travel for lifting the pivot foot prior to starting a dribble. The same reason it is a travel when a player goes up for a jump shot, drops the ball, then retrieves it. That's a travel.

[SamIAm]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

Yes it is...That would be a travel for lifting the pivot foot prior to starting a dribble. The same reason it is a travel when a player goes up for a jump shot, drops the ball, then retrieves it. That's a travel.

It is only a travel if A1 has not picked-up the dribble. In the OP, the dribble had been picked-up. I do not see where you changed that scenario.

The NCAA case play is A.R. 200. This ruling is identical in FED. Illegal Dribble.

I have used the following as a rule of thumb -
There is only one way to travel without the ball: A1 having secured the ball while laying or setting on the floor (not standing), then releases the ball, stands up, then picks up the ball, all this with no other players touching the ball.

But A.R. 200 Includes another possibility in sitch 1.
Is FED and NCAA in agreement?

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by SamIAm

It is only a travel if A1 has not picked-up the dribble. In the OP, the dribble had been picked-up. I do not see where you changed that scenario.

The NCAA case play is A.R. 200. This ruling is identical in FED. Illegal Dribble.

I have used the following as a rule of thumb -
There is only one way to travel without the ball: A1 having secured the ball while laying or setting on the floor (not standing), then releases the ball, stands up, then picks up the ball, all this with no other players touching the ball.

But A.R. 200 Includes another possibility in sitch 1.
Is FED and NCAA in agreement?

If a player passes the ball and retrieves the pass, that is considered a dribble.

• If the player has not dribbled yet and does not lift his/her pivot prior to releasing the ball then it's a legal play.
• If the player lifts his/her pivot foot (ie: jump) prior to releasing the ball it is a travel for lifting one's pivot prior to dribbling.
• If the player has already completed a dribble prior to this action then it's an illegal dribble.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by SamIAm

Please forgive me for splitting hairs here, but that is still not a travel.

Why not? The player lifted his/her pivot foot before beginning what turned out to be a dribble. That's travelling.

See 4.44.3B

[SamIAm]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Why not? The player lifted his/her pivot foot before beginning what turned out to be a dribble. That's travelling.

See 4.44.3B

4.44.3B has the player returning to the floor with the ball. BNRs sitch is with the ball being released.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by SamIAm

4.44.3B has the player returning to the floor with the ball. BNRs sitch is with the ball being released.

In the 2008-09 book the player jumps, releases the ball and starts a dribble -- travelling violation. I thought that was the play being discussed. Apologies if it wasn't.

[SamIAm]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

In the 2008-09 book the player jumps, releases the ball and starts a dribble -- travelling violation. I thought that was the play being discussed. Apologies if it wasn't.

I referenced an 06-07 online Fed version. It might be that my reference was incorrect. BNR's post #26 covers all the possibilities of which I am aware.
No apology necessary as no offense was taken. Friends?
(Boy isn't this kinder, gentler forum great!)