Throw-in, Double Foul

[referee99]

Answers: b & d.
(NFHS 4-36-2b, 7-5-7b; NCAA 4-53-2c, 7-5-6, 7-5-10)

[Adam]

Well, at least they got one right.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by Scrapper1

That's not the case. The POI definition was first added in the '05-'06 rulebook. It was exactly the same as it appears now.

I hope you realize that I'm not trying to be picky just to annoy you. I'm just trying to follow-up on your point.

Not at all.

My point still remains. The statement about during FTs is superfluous. The original infraction and the activity related to is has not been completed. If the activity related to the original infraction is not complete, then it is involved in the new situation and the resolution to the new situation.

Rule 6-4-3 doesn't mention FTs at all (only infractions, goals, team control, and end of period). It stands on its own. Rule 4-36-2 mentions FTs. The fact that 6-4-3 doesn't and 4-36-2 does indicates that 4-36-2 is just a expanded listing of the situations that meet the requirements for 6-4-3.

[Back In The Saddle]

6-4-3 is specifically enumerating situations where an AP throw-in is used. It shouldn't even be mentioning free throws and when a team is entitled to a "normal" throw-in.

IMHO 6-4-3-g should be rewritten to read something along the lines of: "Double personal, double technical or simultaneous fouls occur and the point of interruption is an alternating possession throw-in. See 4-36-2."