Another NBA official implicated

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by tomegun

If someone can tell me that I'm using the word wrong, I will be big enough to admit it.

My opinion is that I personally wouldn't have used the verbiage that you used. Foster was falsely implicated....emphasis on "was". He was cleared of any implication in what Donaghy was involved in.

A truer heading of this thread imo might have been "Another NBA official cleared of implications." That lets everybody know that the integrity of that official was brought into question but nothing incriminating was ever found.

As I said though, that's just my personal opinion. My opinion doesn't make it right and it also sureashell doesn't mean that anybody else would be wrong if they disagreed with my opinion. And no matter what, it doesn't mean that I'm telling you or anybody else what to post. How you want to use the word "implicated" is completely up to you and no one else.

That concept is completely different than someone disagreeing with what has been already posted. Hopefully I'll never make the mistake of telling you what to post. Whether I agree or disagree with what you post is a whole 'nother (and different) matter.