Strangest call of the tournament - Page 5

Bart Tyson · #61 (**permalink**) Wed Apr 10, 2002, 04:25pm

JR, Whenever you have a double violation the FT is canceled. So, you not going to get the 2nd FT as a result of B1's violation. The 2nd FT is not automatic, it is only a posibility if the 1st FT is missed.

Jurassic Referee · #62 (**permalink**) Wed Apr 10, 2002, 08:18pm

Quote:

Originally posted by Bart Tyson
JR, Whenever you have a double violation the FT is canceled. So, you not going to get the 2nd FT as a result of B1's violation. The 2nd FT is not automatic, it is only a posibility if the 1st FT is missed.

Good point,Bart.Had to do some re-thinking.I can agree with that as long as everyone understands the difference between "cancelled" and "unsuccessful".They are two completely different animals in this play,and the word "cancel" is used in another CB play(CB9.1.4SIT.B-b).A couple of friends of mine,who are interpreters for their associations,are having fun with this one,too.An official interpretation(for this area)is supposed to be on the way.I think you got me leaning your way now.

Bart Tyson · #63 (**permalink**) Wed Apr 10, 2002, 08:56pm

OK JR, all togather now, lean forward and then lean back, now lean forward faster and lean back slowly, forward fast, back slow, forward fast, back slow, etc. Now your are going to ge there.