Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
Originally posted by Bart Tyson
JR, I think I figured out the problem. You and maybe some others are looking at the rule book 6-7-5. Mark Dexter and I are asking you to look at the Case book 6-7-5.
|
Bart,both the rulebook and the casebook are saying the exact same thing.That's Casebook 6-7-5A.The inadvertant whistle makes the ball dead immediately.The initial FT also ends with the inadvertant whistle.You cannot score a FT with a dead ball.These are all rules that I quoted,and are plainly written.You can't ignore them by using a delayed violation signal.The FT is unsuccessful because the whistle went early for the violation.The replacement FT is for the wrongly whistled violation.I have not to date seen anything quoted out of the rule or case book that will allow for anything different.If someone can find something,I'll certainly be glad to consider it.I've been wrong before,but I don't think I am in this case.
|
JR I'm confuesed. I know so whats new. Maybe we are saying the same thing. The rules say, B1 violates the lane, official whistles, no shot was taken, then the official gets the ball and reamin. the ball to the FT'er, and he misses, then the official gives him another shot for the violation.
If you disagree with this, then you are disagreeing with the case play, which is the rule. Are we saying the same thing?