Lakers/Celtics

[jimpiano]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Nothing wrong with the call....only the troll making the posts.

When a team wins by 40 points, trollboy, officiating is not a factor. And one call isn't a trend either.

Back under your bridge.....shoo, shoo....

There was no intent of criticizing the official, since he made the same call when the game was on the line and when it wasn't.

No wonder he is working the big games.

Too bad the league didn't have the common sense to keep its collective mouth shut.

[Bad Zebra]

Originally Posted by jimpiano

... since he made the same call when the game was on the line and when it wasn't.

No wonder he is working the big games....

Gee, I was wondering how they picked the guys for the big games.

[JRutledge]

Enny, meany, miney, moe........

Peace

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Bad Zebra

I was wondering how they picked the guys for the big games.

[Mark Padgett]

[BktBallRef]

Originally Posted by jimpiano

Too bad the league didn't have the common sense to keep its collective mouth shut.

The same can be said of you.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Back under your bridge.....shoo, shoo....

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
Too bad the league didn't have the common sense to keep its collective mouth shut.

Originally Posted by BktBallRef

The same can be said of you.

I'm truly sick of the double standard being implemented by one of the moderators on this forum. I don't know who it is for sure, but I have an idea.
Why are comments such as those above allowed, yet when I write a post that is obviously in jest inquiring how to put Rut on a slow boat to China it gets deleted very quickly?

It is quite clear that one of the moderators is playing favorites here and doing as Rut desires, but not giving equal treatment to others. I find that unacceptable.
Also this is certainly not the first time that this has taken place. Negative and insulting posts by Rut and his lapdog, icallfouls, directed towards me are not deleted, but the slightest barb which I send in their direction is quickly expunged.

So I now call upon this moderator to cease his unequal and unfair treatment of posters on this forum.
I must add, if the mod is who I believe he is, that knowing someone personally and having worked games with an individual does not justify preferential treatment on this forum.

[JRutledge]

Why is every other post you make about me?

I am not a moderator and I did not delete your post. And there is a difference between a whining little piss on like yourself and people pointing out that a certain individual is a troll and does nothing but troll on this site. I do not cry every time you try to insult me. Actually I have learned to ignore you and show how irrelevant you truly are.

If you do not like the decisions that are made, contact the moderators or leave the site. This place is not your personal playground for you to do and say whatever you want. If you are so big and bad, create your personal discussion board and you will not have to worry about what I do or say because I certainly will not be there.

I have had my disagreements over the years with the people that run this site and I at least can be man enough to contact them through PM or email. Ask Brad how many conversations I have had with him over the years. Stop being a little baby. Oh, I forgot who I was talking to.

Peace

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

And there is a difference between a whining little piss on like yourself and people pointing out that a certain individual is a troll and does nothing but troll on this site.

Tsk, tsk, tsk......

Tsk!

Jeff, I hate to take Mr. Spelling's job (because he might complain to the mods next) but the word is pissant

From Dictionary.com:
"Pissant"- a person or thing of no value or consequence

Good call.

PS- jimpiano is a pissant also.

And that's from someone who just might be leading the free world in total arguments with Jeff over the years, Nevada. There's one slight difference though. I try to forget those arguments when they're over. I think that he does too. Give it a whirl.....and leave the moderating in the very capable hands of the moderators(and also note that I might also lead the free world in posts deleted by those moderators over the years also).

Just my 1.45 euros.

[Nevadaref]

Just to be clear, I was NOT and am NOT complaining about Rut. I don't give a #*$& about him. He's just ignorant. In fact, so ignorant that he can't even properly spell the name that he is trying to call someone else.

My complaint is with the moderator(s) who continue to delete my posts because of a friendship with him. I actually don't care if my posts get deleted as long as those of other posters, Rut included, which are insulting also receive the same treatment. However, this has not been the case, and so I am complaining about this injustice. That's all.

[Jurassic Referee]

Sigh.....

Carry on carrying on, Nevada.

You don't happen to work for the post Office, do you?

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Just to be clear, I was NOT and am NOT complaining about Rut. I don't give a #*$& about him. He's just ignorant. In fact, so ignorant that he can't even properly spell the name that he is trying to call someone else.

My complaint is with the moderator(s) who continue to delete my posts because of a friendship with him. I actually don't care if my posts get deleted as long as those of other posters, Rut included, which are insulting also receive the same treatment. However, this has not been the case, and so I am complaining about this injustice. That's all.

The funny thing is I am so ignorant that you keep talking about me in every other post. And if you have a real gripe with the moderators, they have ways to contact them directly.

You have already mentionad my name 3 more times. Usually women are the ones calling more than one time. Maybe that just goes to show what you are really all about that.

Why don't you contact the National Federation, they might be able to help you on this very serious issue.

Peace

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Tsk, tsk, tsk......

Tsk!

Jeff, I hate to take Mr. Spelling's job (because he might complain to the mods next) but the word is pissant

From Dictionary.com:
"Pissant"- a person or thing of no value or consequence

Good call.

PS- jimpiano is a pissant also.

I actually meant to say "piss on." It is the same thing as calling someone a "pee on." But your word pissant is probably a better description.

Peace

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

If you are so big and bad, create your personal discussion board ...

This one will do just fine, if you will stop calling in your "mommy" (personal moderator) to handle your business.

Originally Posted by JRutledge

I actually meant to say "piss on." But your word pissant is probably a better description.

Of course, that was what you meant to write even though it doesn't make sense and is wrong. You wrote it because you truly believed that was the correct phrase because that is how you heard it growing up. Unfortunately, it serves as just another example of your poor education. Chances are high that you were completely unaware of what you call "JR's word."

I don't have a problem with people who lacked proper instruction in the English language while growing up, I have pity for them as it was not their fault, but I do object to those who simply insist that they are always right and already know everything instead of making the effort to improve their below average communication skills. It is that arrogance which continues to foster their ignorance. Sadly that is the category into which you fall.

[Bad Zebra]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

I actually meant to say "piss on." It is the same thing as calling someone a "pee on." ...

Again, not wanting to be the Annoying Spelling Guy...and get in the middle of this entertaining "peeing" contest...I think you meant "peon"

pe·on /[pee-uhn, pee-on] –noun
any person of low social status, esp. one who does work regarded as menial or unskilled;