The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 26, 2008, 06:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: In a little pink house
Posts: 5,289
Whacked in the stack

AAU BV game this week, 2 man crew. Throw-in near the division line in front court. Throwing team sets up in a stack, four deep. During the throw-in a defender tries to go around the top of stack (the end away from the sideline) and, according to the coach, gets and elbow to the face while going around a screen. The kid goes down.

My question is, how do you referee a stack like this. One official can't realistically watch 4 matchups at once. Then again, neither can two each watch 4 matchups. Somehow you'd have to divide and conquer. But in this experience, the contact occurred on the far side of the stack from my partner, and while I was behind the kid that got hit and was completely straightlined. Not to mention my attention was already on some shenanigans going on in the stack.

I feel bad that the kid got hit. But neither of us saw it happen, nor do I think we could reasonably have been expected to (although that sounds like a cop out). But if there's a better way to handle this situation, I'd like to know.
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 26, 2008, 06:59pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 22,934
Referee The Stack ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Back In The Saddle
2 man crew. Throw-in near the division line in front court. Throwing team sets up in a stack, four deep. During the throw-in a defender tries to go around the top of stack (the end away from the sideline) and, according to the coach, gets and elbow to the face while going around a screen. My question is, how do you referee a stack like this. But if there's a better way to handle this situation, I'd like to know.
Tough situation. I don't know of any mechanics that are specifically tailored for this situation, but here's my two cents worth of input:

The administering official should concentrate on the thrower (designated spot, boundary line, etc.), the defender on the thrower (boundary, delay of game, etc.), and, if possible, nobody said this was an easy job, which is why we get paid the "big bucks", the next closest two opponents (fouls, etc.). Yeah, I know that this could be anywhere from two, to four players, but, as I said, this is a tough situation.

The non administering official should be the lead, on the endline, but on the ball side of the court. He, or she, should be observing eight players, that is everyone but the thrower and the defender of the thrower, looking for fouls, etc.

Both officials should open up to get a wide angle look at the play, and yet still be close enough to see the things that they're supposed to be looking for.

Will these mechanics guarantee that the two officials will not miss the elbow, or the push, the illegal screen, etc? No. That's why we have three man mechanics.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 26, 2008, 07:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: washington
Posts: 29
Stack

Were all 10 player's involved in the stack including the thrower-in and his defender, and if so where was your partner located, if he had 1 match up, how competitive was it, if it wasn't maybe they should have been watching the back side of this play more and with the corner of his eye watching his. Also keep in mind that all of us have seen horrible crashes that were incidental, maybe the kid ran into an inadvertent elbow. I agree with BM that this is tough.

Last edited by emtp; Sat Apr 26, 2008 at 07:03pm.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 26, 2008, 07:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,995
1. The official administering the throw-in (the Trail) should drop into the backcourt and bounce the ball to the thrower. This depth will provide a better view of the stack formation from the side instead of from the front, which would block the view of many of the players. I would think that an official would have a good look at a player making a curl run around the end of the stack from this position. In my opinion the actions of the players in the stack are more important to keep an eye on than those of the thrower and the probably one defender guarding the inbound pass. Those two players likely aren't going to have physical contact.

2. The Lead official obviously does not belong on the endline in such a situation and should adjust his positioning based upon the location of the players. Probably coming up to the FT line extended or even the top of the key (and possibly a couple of steps out onto the court) would put this official in a decent position to observe the action and also project a greater officiating presence to the players. Having an official standing nearby usually cuts down on the nonsense as the players have a greater sense that they are being watched.

Last edited by Nevadaref; Sat Apr 26, 2008 at 08:32pm.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 26, 2008, 07:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,995
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac
Tough situation. I don't know of any mechanics that are specifically tailored for this situation, but here's my two cents worth of input:

The administering official should concentrate on the thrower (designated spot, boundary line, etc.), the defender on the thrower (boundary, delay of game, etc.), and, if possible, nobody said this was an easy job, which is why we get paid the "big bucks", the next closest two opponents (fouls, etc.). Yeah, I know that this could be anywhere from two, to four players, but, as I said, this is a tough situation.

The non administering official should be the lead, on the endline, but on the ball side of the court. He, or she, should be observing eight players, that is everyone but the thrower and the defender of the thrower, looking for fouls, etc.

Both officials should open up to get a wide angle look at the play, and yet still be close enough to see the things that they're supposed to be looking for.

Will these mechanics guarantee that the two officials will not miss the elbow, or the push, the illegal screen, etc? No. That's why we have three man mechanics.
Clearly, Billy and I disagree on the focus and positioning of the officials.
I believe that the biggest reasons that officials miss severe situations are positioning and area of focus. They are either standing where there are no players and nothing going on or looking at what isn't likely going to be a contact situation when there is a high probability of there being such in another match-up. Recognizing where to be and what to watch are acquired traits of skilled officials.

Last edited by Nevadaref; Sat Apr 26, 2008 at 07:35pm.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 26, 2008, 07:19pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 22,934
Hand To Thrower, Or Bounce Pass To Thrower ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
The official administering the throw-in (the Trail) should drop into the backcourt and bounce the ball to the thrower. This depth with provide a better view of the stack formation from the side instead of from the front, which would block the view of many of the players.
Good advice. However, my local board, and our poorly written IAABO mechanics, encourage us to hand the ball to the thrower when there is defensive pressure. To follow your excellent advice, and still follow our local mechanics, and our "confusing" IAABO mechanics, I would hand the ball to the thrower and back away as quickly as possible to open up and get some depth.

We haven't used NFHS mechanics in a few years. The last time that we used them we were taught to only hand the ball the the thrower on the back endline, and on the sidelines (never on the frontcourt endline), if, and only if, there was no defensive pressure. Have the NFHS mechanics changed in the past few years to allow a bounce pass to the thrower, let's say on the sideline, even if there is defensive pressure?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 26, 2008, 07:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,995
For as long as I have been officiating the NFHS has recommended handing the ball to the thrower along an endline and bouncing the ball when the throw-in spot is along a sideline.

PS I just checked and this is still current per 2.2.2 A 5&6.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 26, 2008, 07:41pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 22,934
Still Good Advice ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
The Lead official obviously does not belong on the endline in such a situation and should adjust his positioning based upon the location of the players. Probably coming up to the FT line extended or even the top of the key (and possibly a couple of steps out onto the court) would put this official in a decent position to observe the action and also project a greater officiating presence to the players. Having an official standing nearby usually cuts down on the nonsense as the players have a greater sense that they are being watched.
I agree, as long as you're talking about the lead being on the ball side. By endline, I meant start on the endline, before the ball is even in the hands of the administering official, and then as you realize that you're going to be all by yourself, and your partner is going to be within ten feet of all ten players, move up, as you said, to at least the foul line extended. In this setup, the lead should not be paying any attention to the thrower, or the thrower's defender, but should, as you stated, be focused on the other eight players. I like your statement, "Having an official standing nearby usually cuts down on the nonsense as the players have a greater sense that they are being watched". I have found this to be not only effective in inbounding situations, but in "rough" rebounding free throw situations, and in post player/defender situations.

Last edited by BillyMac; Sat Apr 26, 2008 at 08:01pm.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 26, 2008, 07:55pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 22,934
Thanks ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
For as long as I have been officiating the NFHS has recommended handing the ball to the thrower along an endline and bouncing the ball when the throw-in spot is along a sideline. I just checked and this is still current per 2.2.2 A 5&6.
Thanks. As I said, our local board no longer uses NFHS mechanics. My 1998-99 handbook, when we were using 100% NFHS mechanics states "220. The official shall hand (not toss) the ball to the thrower." Since then we used a hybrid version of NFHS and IAABO mechanics, and have moved to all IAABO mechanics the past four years. The current IAABO mechanics encourage us, in some circumstances, to hand the ball to the thrower, on the sideline, when there is defensive pressure. I wish we would go back to NFHS mechanics. I don't know why we changed?

Last edited by BillyMac; Sat Apr 26, 2008 at 08:24pm.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 26, 2008, 07:59pm
Broadcaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: LaGrange, Ga.
Posts: 364
OK, I read that wrong. I thought the topic was "whacked in the sack."

Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 26, 2008, 08:06pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 22,934
What Have You Done With The Real Mark Padgett ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by voiceoflg
OK, I read that wrong. I thought the topic was "whacked in the sack."
Mark Padgett changed his screen name to voiceoflg, and moved Oregon to Georgia.

Or, voiceoflg has kidnapped Mark Padgett and is holding him hostage in Georgia. What's the ransom? How much to we have to pay for you to keep Mark Padgett, and to guarantee that he will never come back to the Forum?

Wait a minute. Didn't O. Henry write a short story about a similar situation called "The Ransom Of Red Chief". After spending a few days with Mark Padgett, voiceoflg will be offering the Forum some money to take Mark Padgett back. I got news for you voiceoflg, it's gonna cost you big time for us to take him off your hands.

Last edited by BillyMac; Sat Apr 26, 2008 at 08:22pm.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 26, 2008, 08:15pm
9/11 - Never Forget
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 5,642
Send a message via Yahoo to grunewar
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac
Mark Padgett changed his screen name to voiceoflg, and moved Oregon to Georgia.
So now there's TWO of him? Say it isn't so?
__________________
There was the person who sent ten puns to friends, with the hope that at least one of the puns would make them laugh. No pun in ten did.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 26, 2008, 08:27pm
ODJ ODJ is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 390
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac
Thanks. As I said, our local board no longer uses NFHS mechanics. My 1998-99 handbook, when we were using 100% NFHS mechanics states "220. The official shall hand (not toss) the ball to the thrower." Since then we used a hybrid version of NFHS and IAABO mechanics, and have moved to all IAABO mechanics the past four years. The current IAABO mechanics encourage us, in some circumstances, to hand the ball to the thrower, on the sideline, when there is defensive pressure. I wish we would go back to NFHS mechanics. I don't know why we changed?
Fed changed this a few years ago to allow a bounce to the thrower on the sideline.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 26, 2008, 08:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
I'd have the administering official watch his/her side of the stack (and the "end" by the inbounder) and the non-administering official watch the other side (and other end)..
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 26, 2008, 08:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,995
Billy,
Two comments:
1. My personal preference is for the Lead to remain on the opposite side of the court from the throw-in in this particular situation because the play occurs out near midcourt and there aren't any players down in the FT lane.
I don't have a problem with the Lead coming strong side in 2-man and do it frequently myself, but I just wouldn't in this situation. However, if the throw-in were FT line extended in the frontcourt, then I believe that it would make more sense for the Lead to come strongside on the endline as it is much more likely that the throw-in could go directly to the elbow or the block.

2. Please remember the purpose of officiating mechanics--to put an official in the position from which he is most likely to have the best view of the play. There are very good reasons for why the mechanics are the way that they are and they have been studied and developed by some of the best in the business. However, they cannot cover all possible situations and when one finds oneself in an oddball situation, don't be afraid to adjust and do whatever is necessary to obtain the best look at the play even if that means temporarily deviating from the prescribed mechanics. The mechanics are just your guide to good officiating, but when you have a valid reason to break those guidelines you have a responsibility to the good of the game to do so. Don't be afraid that some evaluator is going to tell you that you weren't standing in the textbook spot. Seeing the play and getting the call correct is more important.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Should have whacked the kid! Stripes33 Basketball 9 Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:43pm
1st grade assistant get whacked! howie719 Basketball 20 Tue May 08, 2007 09:29pm
Should I have Whacked him? biz Basketball 16 Tue Jan 17, 2006 05:54pm
whacked my first coach totalnewbie Basketball 31 Wed Feb 16, 2005 03:48pm
Whacked!! ripian Basketball 10 Thu Jun 13, 2002 01:20pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:36am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1