Resumption of Play Scenerio?

[Freddy]

NFHS Question re. ROP:

4-38 says, "The procedure results in a violation instead of a technical foul for initial delay in specific situations." (note: "results in...").
> > > Always??? < < <

8-1-2, on ROP says, in part, "Either or both teams may be charged with a violation." (note: "may be...)

QUESTION: Does an "ROP" at the free throw line always result in a violation?

Scenerio A: Shooter of the free throw is the only one unnecessarily late coming out of a time-out huddle near the bench area. His four teammates are all on the floor in adequate time, two in their proper lane spaces and two near mid-court. Before the ten-count is reached, the shooter hustles into legal position to shoot the free throw and executes it before the count of ten is reached.
No violation, right? Or wrong?

Scenerio B: All players are late coming out of time-out huddle near the bench area. Ball is placed and the ten-count begins. Shooter of free throw runs out first and picks up the ball to try to get the shot off before the ten-count ends. After he picks up the ball, he waits for his teammates to get in proper position and his one teammate hustles across the lane to take his legal lane space.
Violation, right? Or wrong?

Thank you for helping enhance understanding on this.

(P.S. I know there are tactful ways to keep from having to actually do a ROP. I have never actually done an ROP procedure. Never had to. My question pertains to when it is actually warranted--what the rules require.)