Another pet peeve

[fullor30]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Don't agree at all. Any action that is NOT illegal is just fine.

If you are calling fouls simply because you don't like the way that the player attempts to play defense, then you are seriously in error.

REACHING is not a foul.

Where did I say reaching was a foul?


Put down your whistle, and put on your coaching shirt if that's possible, I'm speaking from a coaching perspective.

If you are calling fouls simply because you don't like the way that the player attempts to play defense, then you are seriously in error.

Why in heaven's sake would you assume that?


This thread is not about what is or isn't a foul, if you can't comprehend the discourse, follow along and it will make sense you, I promise.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by fullor30

Where did I say reaching was a foul?

In your first post you never stated that there was contact or that the kid hit the dribbler. You only mentioned reaching as if that was why you called a foul on the player.

Originally Posted by fullor30

If you are calling fouls simply because you don't like the way that the player attempts to play defense, then you are seriously in error.

Why in heaven's sake would you assume that?

Because you wrote this:

Originally Posted by fullor30

B1 strips ball from A1 by reaching across A1's body

[fullor30]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

In your first post you never stated that there was contact or that the kid hit the dribbler. You only mentioned reaching as if that was why you called a foul on the player.



Because you wrote this:

You failed to read the whole post "clearly fouling A1"

I can't make it any clearer, counselor. Operative word is clearly.

Don't be so silly.