![]() |
|
|
|||
Georgetown / Providence
The official told the coach that he could not be the last one to touch the ball, go out of bounds, then be the first to touch the ball inbounds. (Even though he had established himself inbounds before touching.)
__________________
GO HERD !!!! Mark Michael |
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) Last edited by JRutledge; Mon Feb 18, 2008 at 10:53pm. |
|
|||
Another Myth Bites The Dust ....
If a player's momentum carries him or her off the court, he or she can be the first player to touch the ball after returning inbounds. That player must not have left the court voluntarily and must immediately return inbounds. That player must have something in and nothing out. It is not necessary to have both feet back inbounds. It is a violation for a player to intentionally leave the court for an unauthorized reason.
Is it possible, in the original post, that the official thought the player has possession before going out of bounds, and that after legally coming back in bounds, started a dribble, which was an illegal, or double dribble? |
|
|||
Quote:
![]()
__________________
It is what it is!! |
|
|||
Quote:
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nova vs Georgetown | grunewar | Basketball | 83 | Mon Mar 03, 2008 07:57pm |
Ohio State & Georgetown | All_Heart | Basketball | 45 | Sun Jun 03, 2007 05:36am |
Georgetown/UNC | tomegun | Basketball | 4 | Sun Mar 25, 2007 11:11pm |
Providence/Tex game | Dan_ref | Basketball | 29 | Wed Jan 07, 2004 10:14pm |
Virginia-Georgetown | TGR | Basketball | 6 | Mon Mar 20, 2000 09:30am |