From the 1st Year: Created a little test for myself...

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by ca_rumperee

I have 3 players on floor given Flagrant Fouls: 1 W, 2 B
----all 3 are disqualified
I have 3 fighting players from bench given Flagrant fouls: 1 W, 2 B
---all 3 are disqualified
I have 6 bench players who left bench to break it up: 5 W, 1 B
---all 6 are disqualified.
so, 12 players disqualified: 7 W 5B

I'm nitpicking your terminology here. By definition there can only be a maximum of 10 players at any point in the game. The people on the bench aren't "players." See 4-34-1.

Originally Posted by ca_rumperee

Free Throws:
Floor players fighting: Team W shoots 2 FTs
Bench players fighting: Team W shoots 2 FTs
Bench players NOT fighting: unequal number, maximum of 1 technical , so Team B shoots 2 FTS

Who gets the ball? Dunno

This case book play demonstrates that the FTs from categories 2 and 3 can offset. The NFHS has never issued one that clearly shows that categories 1 and 2 or 1 and 3 can cancel, but I believe that the intent is for them to do so. It greatly simplifies the process to do it that way. I'd love to see the federation clarify this point.


10.4.5 SITUATION E: A1 and B1 begin fighting and play is stopped. Substitute A6 leaves the bench area and enters the court to observe. B6 also enters the court at the same time, but B6 actually participates in the fight. RULING: A1, B1, A6 and B6 are all disqualified. No free throws result from the double flagrant foul by A1 and B1 or from the simultaneous technical fouls by A6 and B6. Each head coach is charged with one indirect technical foul. Play resumes at the point of interruption. (4-36; 10-3-9)