The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jan 26, 2008, 08:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Richmond, IN
Posts: 402
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
You can rephrase it, but your re-phrasing is 100% diametrically opposite to what you stated above. As per NFHS rule 4-6-2, you were completely wrong. That's what Bob was telling you.
Can't get nothing by you JR!!!! I got to writing to quickly between BI and GT and didn't take the time to comprehend what I wrote....thus why I said let me rephrase!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gimlet25id
If no part of the ball is on the rim or the imaginary cylinder above the rim which has the ring as its base then this is nothing and even if it was it would never be goal-tending.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gimlet25id
If the ball was on the rim or in the imaginary cylinder and B1 hits the net, the call would be basket interference.
"DELETE IMAGINARY"

Your right! I was wrong! Thanks for being so quick to point that out.
__________________
It is what it is!!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jan 26, 2008, 09:02pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gimlet25id
Can't get nothing by you JR!!!! I got to writing to quickly between BI and GT and didn't take the time to comprehend what I wrote....thus why I said let me rephrase!

If the ball was on the rim or in the imaginary cylinder and B1 hits the net, the call would be basket interference.


"DELETE IMAGINARY"

Your right! I was wrong! Thanks for being so quick to point that out.
OK, let's delete "imaginary".

The statement now reads "If the ball was on the rim or in the cylinder and B1 hits the net, the call would be basket interference."

You're still completely wrong. It is not BI to hit the net while the ball is in the cylinder. Rule 4-6-2 tells you what the cylinder is. Rule 4-6-1 tells you that you can only call BI if the net is touched while the ball is on or within the basket. Rule 1-10-1 tells you exactly what the basket is.

You really don't understand the rule, do you?

Last edited by Jurassic Referee; Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:07pm.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jan 26, 2008, 09:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Richmond, IN
Posts: 402
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
OK, let's delete "imaginary".

The statement now reads "If the ball was on the ring or in the cylinder and B1 hits the net, the call would be basket interference."

You're still completely wrong. It is not BI to hit the net while the ball is in the cylinder. Rule 4-6-2 tells you what the cylinder is. Rule 4-6-1 tells you that you can only call BI if the net is touched while the ball is on or within the basket. Rule 1-10-1 tells you exactly what the basket is.

You really don't understand the rule, do you?
Post #13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gimlet25id
I read this to say that if the ball is in the cylinder not the imaginary cylinder, but the cylinder of the basket (RIM) and the net is touched then that would be BI.
I think this PREVIOUS post explains what I meant although worded incorrectly. Pretty sure I have a good handle on the BI/GT requirements.

cylinder (plural cylinders)

(geometry) A surface created by projecting a closed two-dimensional curve along an axis intersecting the plane of the curve.
When the two-dimensional curve is a circle, the cylinder is called a circular cylinder. When the axis is perpendicular to the plane of the curve, the cylinder is called a right cylinder. In non-mathematical usage, both 'right and circular are usually implied.
(geometry) A solid figure bounded by a cylinder and two parallel planes intersecting the cylinder.


After looking up the word cylinder I realize You & Bob are absolutely correct in the fact that ,"basket" & "cylinder," means two different things. Ring, cylinder, I thought they were the same. Now I know!

Really not sure how many times you want to be proven right but that chalks up two more for JR. Like I said before I was writing faster then I was comprehending. My mistake!
__________________
It is what it is!!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jan 26, 2008, 10:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gimlet25id

#1 - Pretty sure I have a good handle on the BI/GT requirements.

#2 - After looking up the word cylinder I realize You & Bob are absolutely correct in the fact that ,"basket" & "cylinder," means two different things. Ring, cylinder, I thought they were the same. Now I know!
Doesn't #2 pretty much make #1 a false statement?
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott

"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jan 26, 2008, 11:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Richmond, IN
Posts: 402
Quote:
Originally Posted by BktBallRef
Doesn't #2 pretty much make #1 a false statement?
Well I guess it would seem so. The way I would rule BI would be the same. Like I said I wrongly (for the third time) assumed cylinder & basket were considered the same thing. Thinking imaginary cylinder was the space above the rim and cylinder was the rim or the same as the rim.

I thought a ball inside of the ring could also be considered inside of the cylinder, which by definition would be wrong as Bob & JR stated earlier.

Regardless if I was calling the rim the cylinder or the rim it wouldn't change how I will look @ the play. However this discussion will/has changed the way I will define BI.

__________________
It is what it is!!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 27, 2008, 03:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by BktBallRef
Doesn't #2 pretty much make #1 a false statement?

Not neccessarily.

I can believe he knows when it needs to be call but not how to put it into the proper words.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Goal Tending satellite_6 Basketball 18 Sat Jan 12, 2008 04:18pm
Goal tending or no? (WASH/UConn) gostars Basketball 27 Sun Mar 26, 2006 07:28pm
Goal tending after block Damian Basketball 2 Tue Nov 23, 2004 11:01pm
goal tending ohad_d Basketball 0 Sat Jan 04, 2003 04:19pm
goal tending John Schaefferkoetter Basketball 4 Thu Dec 19, 2002 11:45am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1