Goal Tending

[Gimlet25id]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

You can rephrase it, but your re-phrasing is 100% diametrically opposite to what you stated above. As per NFHS rule 4-6-2, you were completely wrong. That's what Bob was telling you.

Can't get nothing by you JR!!!! I got to writing to quickly between BI and GT and didn't take the time to comprehend what I wrote....thus why I said let me rephrase!

Originally Posted by Gimlet25id

If no part of the ball is on the rim or the imaginary cylinder above the rim which has the ring as its base then this is nothing and even if it was it would never be goal-tending.

Originally Posted by Gimlet25id

If the ball was on the rim or in the imaginary cylinder and B1 hits the net, the call would be basket interference.

"DELETE IMAGINARY"

Your right! I was wrong! Thanks for being so quick to point that out.