Over and Back by stepping out of "bounds"

[Coltdoggs]

Originally Posted by Johnny Ringo

This is the correct call here: a double dribble?

Wouldn't this be the same concept has the OP?

Yes it is correct...dribble was started, stopped (via the catching), then dribbled again.

In the OP, there never was a stopped dribble/catching of the ball...it was interrupted by her motion of going back into the BC but never did the dribble come to an end.

[BktBallRef]

Johnny Ringo, still waiting on that rule reference that says an interrupted dribble is an unintentional act.

[Coltdoggs]

Originally Posted by BktBallRef

Johnny Ringo, still waiting on that rule reference that says an interrupted dribble is an unintentional act.

Methinks you are going to be waiting longer than a Duke student outside Cameron Indoor before a UNC game!

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by BktBallRef

Johnny Ringo, still waiting on that rule reference that says an interrupted dribble is an unintentional act.

While I don't think you'll get a direct reference, it is at least implied in the interruped dribble rule itself.....the ball doesn't get a way from the dribbler on purpose (unless it comes alive!!!) An interrupted dribble is not when a player choses not to dribble the ball, it's when they can't dribble the ball.

[BktBallRef]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

While I don't think you'll get a direct reference, it is at least implied in the interruped dribble rule itself.....the ball doesn't get a way from the dribbler on purpose (unless it comes alive!!!) An interrupted dribble is not when a player choses not to dribble the ball, it's when they can't dribble the ball.

I don't see anything in the rule that implies it.