|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott "You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith Last edited by BktBallRef; Thu Jan 03, 2008 at 06:54pm. |
|
|||
the case play you are asking for is the one where the dribbler makes a move around a defender and dribbles the ball around ol cement feet while the ball handler goes around the other side which is out of bounds and picks up his dribbler while ol cement feet is still wondering what the heck just happened. this is an oob violation. same for this backcourt play -- its a violation.
__________________
in OS I trust |
|
|||
Most of the replies keep talking about an interrupted dribble ... when I first read the OP I first though of this being a pass and ended up being a pass to herself ... right?
That would make it a violation, forget the over and back. The way the OP read was it was an intentional act ... an interrupted dribble is not done on purpose. |
|
|||
Refresher Exam Question 57
2007 IAABO Refresher Exam, Question 57: While dribbling in the frontcourt, near the division line, A1 steps on the division line. Official rules this a backcourt violation even though he/she is not touching the ball. Is the official correct? Yes (Rule9-9-1)
|
|
|||
Quote:
This is a really good debate we have going... |
|
|||
Quote:
how is this a good debate? we are arguing whether its a violation because the ball is *not* touching the offensive player.....
__________________
in OS I trust |
|
|||
Look how many people we have stirred up on this one! Why does it have to be arguing....I gave that up for 2008...this is a debate!
I'm sorry, but I don't think I have a violation if it's not a continious dribble.... Can anyone YOUTUBE this play so we can see the damn thing! |
|
|||
Quote:
BTW, for the newbies, you would be wise to ignore most anything deecee writes.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott "You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith Last edited by BktBallRef; Fri Jan 04, 2008 at 08:40am. |
|
|||
My advice is this play is not a violation BECAUSE if you cannot explain it do NOT call it.
MTD, Sr.
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Trumbull Co. (Warren, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn. Wood Co. (Bowling Green, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn. Ohio Assn. of Basketball Officials International Assn. of Approved Bkb. Officials Ohio High School Athletic Association Toledo, Ohio |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
In summary, if a dribbler steps on the division line (after being fully in the fc) or a boundary line this is a violation even if the dribbler is not in physical contact with the ball at the time. However, a player may touch the division line or a boundary line during an interrupted dribble without violating. The call hinges on the concept of player control. Casebook play for reference: 7.1.1 SITUATION D: A1 jumps from inbounds to retrieve an errant pass near a boundary line. A1 catches the ball while in the air and tosses it back to the court. A1 lands out of bounds and (a) is the first to touch the ball after returning inbounds; (b) returns inbounds and immediately dribbles the ball; or (c) picks up the ball after returning to the court and then begins a dribble. RULING: Legal in (a) and (b). Illegal in (c) as the controlled toss of the ball to the court by A1 constitutes the start of a dribble, dribbling a second time after picking up the ball is an illegal dribble violation. (4-15-5; 4-15-6d; 4-35; 9-5) |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|||
1) I'm NOT sure the ruling depends on whether this is an interrupted dribble. Without the note in 9-3-1, it wouldn't be an OOB situation -- and there's no similar note in 9-9.
If you don't buy that, then: 2) I seem to recall a case play (or interp) to the effect that "A1 chases a loose ball (yeah -- I know that's not a term) near the sideline. A1 grabs the ball and tosses it back on the court. A1's momentum carries him/her OOB. A1 returns inbounds and grabs the ball, then begins a dribble. Ruling: Double Dribble (yeah ...). A1's first toss to the court was the start of a dribble." So, if the toss was intentional and the start of a dribble, why wasn't it an OOB violation on A1 (under 9-3-1 NOTE)? Because it was an interrupted dribble. So, an interrupted dribble can be "intentional". (Edit to add: Found the case play. See 7.1.1.D) (Edit to add: Damn. NevadaRef found it before I could.) If you don't buy that, then: 3) See MTD's comment. Last edited by bob jenkins; Fri Jan 04, 2008 at 09:10am. |
|
|||
I Can Explain That In One Rule
Quote:
NFHS Rule 3-1-Note: The dribbler has committed a violation if he/she steps on or outside a boundary, even though he/she is not touching the ball while he/she is out of bounds. I can explain it if it's an interrupted dribble: NFHS Rule 4-15-6-d: During an interrupted dribble out of bounds violation does not apply on the player involved in the iinterrupted dribble. Last edited by BillyMac; Fri Jan 04, 2008 at 11:39am. |
|
|||
Quote:
Wouldn't this be the same concept has the OP? |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Partners "stepping in" to your discussion... | rei | Baseball | 43 | Tue Feb 27, 2007 06:33pm |
Time back on clock? I said "No." | bgtg19 | Basketball | 3 | Wed Dec 06, 2006 06:05pm |
Illegal Blocks "in the back" | Rich | Football | 14 | Mon Oct 09, 2006 01:56pm |