Calling on Jurassic (and other wise officials)

[Back In The Saddle]

Originally Posted by jdw3018

I have a question about this one - 8-1-2 reads that following a violation by one or both teams, if the offending team(s) continues to delay, a technical foul shall be called.

Does this mean that because the throw was successful, no violation was called, and therefore no technical for the second delay? If the throw was unsuccessful, would the technical then be called?

I think that's what I'm reading, but not sure if a delayed lane violation is considered a violation for purposes of this rule even if not called?

I was wondering the same thing. To my way of thinking, a free throw violation has been committed. However the penalty for the defense violating on a free throw is that another free throw is awarded if the throw is not good. Therefore the violation has occurred and the penalty enforced. Am I wrong?

[BktBallRef]

Originally Posted by IREFU2

Wow, just taking the test, when does your season start?

The NFHS test date was Monday of this week. If you're taking the online test, you have all week long. So there's nothing late about taking the test at this time.

Originally Posted by IREFU2

Interesting, I was told that VA was going to on line testing next year. How was the experience?

It's been a major headache all week long.

[BktBallRef]

Originally Posted by fullor30

JR..............you always have the right rule # or casebook reference at your fingertips. Is the the product of looking it up or do you have a system for researching these questions. I suspect you do it the old fashioned way and dive into the manuals. The old saying 'he who chops wood stays warm twice', meaning by you looking these cases up, it keeps you spot on regarding rulings.

Not only do you know the letter of the law, but apply common sense to your game philosophy.

Damn, it's getting deep in here!!!!!

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by Dan_ref

btw JR, sorry to hear about your cousin.

I'm know I'm gonna regret this, but......

What cousin, Slappy?

[Dan_ref]

Enjoy

Be an official donator of Friends of the Rotterdam Basketbalclass

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by jdw3018

I have a question about this one - 8-1-2 reads that following a violation by one or both teams, if the offending team(s) continues to delay, a technical foul shall be called.

Does this mean that because the throw was successful, no violation was called, and therefore no technical for the second delay? If the throw was unsuccessful, would the technical then be called?

I think that's what I'm reading, but not sure if a delayed lane violation is considered a violation for purposes of this rule even if not called?

If the FT was good, then we just move on to the next FT. SO, there's not really a "delay". No dealy; no T for "further delay".

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by Dan_ref

Enjoy

Don't be sardonic.

[rockyroad]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Don't be sardonic.

Is that anything like being a pusillanimous??

[rainmaker]

Originally Posted by rockyroad

Is that anything like being a pusillanimous??

Oh, no. Sardonic is much better. More strength. More aggression. Better nicknames!

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by rainmaker

Oh, no. Sardonic is much better. More strength. More aggression. Better nicknames!

That's right out of the best-selling book--"Males Are From Sardonic; Wimmen Are From Pusillanimous".

It's true, it's true......

[rainmaker]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

That's right out of the best-selling book--"Males Are From Sardonic; Wimmen Are From Pusillanimous".

It's true, it's true......

What a sardo... ??? or is that too edgy?