|
|||
Simple terminology Q
Does a disqualified player constitute the definition of "ejection"?
Besides the obvious, the question asks a bit more than just the literal. 4-14 I believe clearly states a "disqualification," and the T summary for player Ts do not have "ejection" prescribed, but a partner that I had last week issued back-to-back Ts on one player during the league's playoff (semifinal; non-state sanctioned). While the Ts were warranted for the particular actions the player did, my partner stated on the court while reporting that the player would not be allowed to play in the final if they won. I'm sure each state has their own ejection policy. I think here, the offender is suspended for so many number of games. I didn't agree with my partner that it suspended the player, only that 2Ts sat the player down for the current game. So, that's the background of my terminology question. Thoughts? BTW, they did not win, so the issue was not really ever raised.
__________________
"Always Remember Your First Game" -Victor M. Susanto |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
And further, the enforcement of any such suspensions are also outside the purview of the officials. It is not our job to bar any player from playing because of a suspension. That is a state matter.
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Simple Question - | Justme | Softball | 9 | Mon Sep 25, 2006 04:35pm |
It's Never Simple | twref | Basketball | 7 | Mon Dec 05, 2005 02:34pm |
Two Simple Questions | whiskers_ump | Softball | 17 | Wed Jan 12, 2005 11:15pm |
This one should be simple..... | GregAlan | Basketball | 32 | Thu Dec 16, 2004 06:48am |
new terminology | Mark Padgett | Basketball | 5 | Sat Jan 12, 2002 09:05pm |