Goofy situation

[refnrev]

Let's review it again.
White has ball to inbound at the baseline.
I have my left hand in the air and am counting with right arm. Whistle is in my mouth.
Blue reaches through the line and commits voundary violation as white tries to throw the ball in. NO - she did not make contact for an intentional foul.
Tweet.
I signal the line violation, and say to players, "We have a boundary violation, blue."
Walk towards the table to reporting area.
Tell my partner who is starting to report a TO to hold the TO until the violation is reported.
Report the violation by saying, "We have bounday violation; blue; first warning."
Go back to baseline with ball.
Partner then reports a TO. Then he asks me, who called the time out?
I think that covers the mechanics I used.

[tjones1]

Bob,

So you are saying your partner told you he had a TO and you told him to hold it until you reported the violation. Once you reported it, then your partner granted the timeout then asked you who called it?

Is that correct?

How do you report a timeout if you don't know who requested it?

I'm just sayin', it sounds like it may be some misinterpretation by the partner.

[Back In The Saddle]

I agree with Nev's general principle here. Whenever I'm involved in a miscommunication (and whatever mess ensues because if it), I first want to know what I could have done differently to prevent the miscommunication.

There was a play in my first game of the year where I'm at T and my partner has a whistle on a drive to the hole. I hustle down to the baseline to start lining the players up for the free throws. Only my partner waves me off because what she actually called was traveling. But she's not very tall, was screened by a group of players who were fairly tall, and I only inferred a foul because "it must be; what else would it be?" Whoops.

Perhaps your partner here believed there was a TO call because...well, what else could it be?

Which does not explain the brain fart that came next with him reporting "your TO," especially after you made your report.

[refnrev]

I need to be clear. I'm not posting this to make anyone look bad, make me look real good, or with any malace. The guy and I have worked together before and will more than likely do so a few more times this year and in the future. It was just a goofy situation that happened... one you obviously don't see very often and hopefully that we can all learn from.

[refnrev]

Originally Posted by tjones1

Bob,

So you are saying your partner told you he had a TO and you told him to hold it until you reported the violation. Once you reported it, then your partner granted the timeout then asked you who called it?

Is that correct?

___________________

You got it ...... Dude!

[tjones1]

Originally Posted by refnrev

___________________

You got it ...... Dude!

Ok, just making sure.

I'm going to be kind of in your neck of the woods tomorrow night - Edinburg.

[refnrev]

Originally Posted by tjones1

Ok, just making sure.

I'm going to be kind of in your neck of the woods tomorrow night - Edinburg.

__________________________

What have you got on a Wednesday night?

[tjones1]

Originally Posted by refnrev

__________________________

What have you got on a Wednesday night?

The end of their Turkey Tournament. I believe we've got the second game of the night at ~6pm.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by refnrev

Tweet.
I signal the line violation, and say to players, "We have a boundary violation, blue."

#1 What specific signal did you use for this? Can you give a number from the NFHS signal chart?

#2 Think about your mechanic. It may not have been clear. If you feel that it was, then no problem. You've done your reflection about this situation, so keep doing as you do. If you aren't happy with it, then make a change.

#3 Have a nice discussion with your partner about why we don't relay or "piggy-back" time-outs. This was likely what led to his confusion on the play. Advise that each official only report the time-outs which have been requested to him. Take your own stuff to the table.




NOTE: This was my 6,000th post!

[dblref]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

#1 What specific signal did you use for this? Can you give a number from the NFHS signal chart?

#2 Think about your mechanic. It may not have been clear. If you feel that it was, then no problem. You've done your reflection about this situation, so keep doing as you do. If you aren't happy with it, then make a change.

#3 Have a nice discussion with your partner about why we don't relay or "piggy-back" time-outs. This was likely what led to his confusion on the play. Advise that each official only report the time-outs which have been requested to him. Take your own stuff to the table.




NOTE: This was my 6,000th post!

Congratulations on your 6,000th post. Too bad only 137 of them were worth reading.

[Nevadaref]

Note to self, contact Cardinal Basketball Officials Assn and @)#R&* about this guy!

[Dan_ref]

Originally Posted by dblref

Congratulations on your 6,000th post. Too bad only 137 of them were worth reading.

That many?

[dblref]

Originally Posted by Dan_ref

That many?

I was feeling charitable.

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

#1 What specific signal did you use for this? Can you give a number from the NFHS signal chart?

#26