NCAA question

[Rev.Ref63]

In Appendix V of the NCAA rulebook, it states that, relative to an airborne shooter, the NFHS states "in air after release of try or tap." The NCAA states "Men-No rule."

On page BR-75 it says:

Section 1. Airborne Shooter
Art. 1. An airborne shooter is in the act of shooting.

A.R. 67. A1 is in the air on a jump shot in the lane. A1 releases the ball on a try and is fouled by B1, who has jumped in an unsuccessful attempt to block the shot. A1’s try is: (a) successful; or (b) unsuccessful. RULING: A1 shall be an airborne shooter when the ball is released until he or she returns with one foot touching the floor. An airborne shooter shall be in the act of shooting. B1 has fouled A1 in the act of shooting. A1 shall be awarded one free throw in (a), and two in (b).

Art. 2. An airborne shooter is a player who has released the ball on a try for
goal until one foot has returned to the floor.

I'm having trouble understanding what the difference in NFHS and NCAA calls would be.

[Adam]

In NCAA, if a shooter fouls a defender after he releases the ball, it's no longer a player control foul. The shot would count and free throws would be shot by B if they were in the bonus.

In NFHS, this would be a player control foul and the shot would not count.

[Nevadaref]

Appendix V is not accurate. The NCAA mens game does have an airborne shooter rule. The rule is just different. As Snaqwells wrote it doesn't pertain to PC fouls. That's all.
We've known about this for a few years now.
The NCAA should fix this.

[rockyroad]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

In NCAA, if a shooter fouls a defender after he releases the ball, it's no longer a player control foul. The shot would count and free throws would be shot by B if they were in the bonus.

In NFHS, this would be a player control foul and the shot would not count.

In the ongoing quest to be nitpickingly accurate, that would true only in NCAA-Mens...NCAA-W is the same as NFHS.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by rockyroad

In the ongoing quest to be nitpickingly accurate, that would true only in NCAA-Mens...NCAA-W is the same as NFHS.

Nice going Sisyphus.

[Dan_ref]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Nice going Sisyphus.

I'm sure you meant no harm but I'm also sure *someone* will take offense to you calling Rocky a sissy.

[rainmaker]

Originally Posted by Dan_ref

I'm sure you meant no harm but I'm also sure *someone* will take offense to you calling Rocky a sissy.

Only in the two-syllable forms. Multisyllabic words are almost always okay, such as pusillanimous, Sysyphus, pansatorhemic, etc

[rockyroad]

Originally Posted by Dan_ref

I'm sure you meant no harm but I'm also sure *someone* will take offense to you calling Rocky a sissy.

Like maybe Rocky himself...

[Adam]

Originally Posted by rockyroad

Like maybe Rocky himself...

Hey, Dan's the one that said it. I said something completely different.

[rockyroad]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Hey, Dan's the one that said it. I said something completely different.

I expect a complete retraction and some serious self-loathing from you now!

[Adam]

Originally Posted by rockyroad

I expect a complete retraction and some serious self-loathing from you now!

Can I loath Jurassic and Dan instead?

[rockyroad]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Can I loath Jurassic and Dan instead?

OK, that works too.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by Dan_ref

I'm sure you meant no harm but I'm also sure *someone* will take offense to you calling Rocky a sissy.

Sigh.....

Time to set the record straight......

Sissy = pansy = OK
Anything remotely related to wimmen = BAD

Misandry = OK
Misogyny = BAD

Dan/JR= BAD
Everybody else = pusillanimouses.

And don't even think of using that real bad P word.

[M&M Guy]

Hackensack = BAD
Hacky Sack = sissy = OK

Hey, I'm startin' to get the hang of this...

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by M&M Guy

Hackensack = BAD

Hackensack = baaaaaaaaaaad!!
Bayonne = baaaaaaaaaaadder!!