2 FTs and the ball?

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Yup, they sure can...... if they happen to commit that foul as an airborne shooter while the ball is live. And if they commit the foul as an airborne shooter when the ball is dead, they could be charged with a technical foul too(as stated above).

It depends on how you read the related rules.

I think the exception is pretty clearly not referring to a PC, as it refers to intentional or flagrant and not a PC foul.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

I think the exception is pretty clearly not referring to a PC, as it refers to intentional or flagrant and not a PC foul.

That is the point which proves this one. Player control fouls must be common fouls per the definition provided in 4-19-6. Since these fouls are intentional or flagrant they are not common fouls according to definition 4-19-2.

Therefore, this statement, "An intentional or flagrant contact foul while the ball is dead, except a foul by an airborne shooter" is definitely saying that when an airborne shooter commits an intentional or flagrant foul while the ball is dead it is not a technical foul. That is the exception.

Hey, have we just attempted to prove that JR is wrong? Is that allowed? Perhaps we should go check that other thread and make sure that we aren't doing something that we shouldn't be.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Hey, have we just attempted to prove that JR is wrong? Is that allowed? Perhaps we should go check that other thread and make sure that we aren't doing something that we shouldn't be.

Nah, you're OK.

I wouldn't recommend telling me what to post though. I know where you live.