Nasty coach

[Adam]

Originally Posted by mick

Had to see it. How far did it go?. Did it hit a player? Was it due to an official call? Was it a knee-jerk reaction to a player?

Judge it. Your call and your game. I'll back you.
Few actions, for me, are as automatic to me as your thrown clipboard.

I didn't say it was automatic. If it's a dropped clipboard, that's different. If I don't see him actually throw it, it's different. If he tries to throw it onto his chair, it's different. In a high school game, it's even a bit different.

MS games? My tolerance for airborne clipboards goes way down.

[JugglingReferee]

Originally Posted by rainmaker

Kids definitely don't need this treatment and rarely, rarely does it yield the kinds of things we say we're working toward.

AMEN!

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by Mark Dexter

One of my most (in)famous post-game ejections was of this very variety.

Your post-game ejections have degrees of infamousness?

[Mark Dexter]

Originally Posted by mbyron

Your post-game ejections have degrees of infamousness?

To clarify - they've all come in intramural games.

[26 Year Gap]

I think that if this coach is behaving like this on a regular basis and gets a steady diet of deserved technical fouls called on him, the AD will notice. I would be pretty PO'd if I were the custodian who waxed the floor, though.

[ChuckElias]

Originally Posted by mbyron

Your post-game ejections have degrees of infamousness?

I log in to celebrate a big Sox win and I find "infamousness"?!?! I have to go now, I'm starting to feel dizzy. Room getting. . . dark. . .

[mbyron]

Well, I had to ask, and I decided against 'infamity', so...

[Dan_ref]

Originally Posted by mbyron

Well, I had to ask, and I decided against 'infamity', so...

...infamitude?

[mick]

... Infanimity.

[mbyron]

Pleafe! Ftop the infanity!

Isn't this better than talking about the Red Sox?

[BLydic]

Originally Posted by mbyron

Isn't this better than talking about the Red Sox?

I agree 101%